FKIE_CVE-2026-3198

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-06-02 04:17 - Updated: 2026-07-21 19:10
Severity
6.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Summary
MLflow 3.9.0 with basic-auth (`--app-name basic-auth`) fails to enforce authorization checks for multiple Gateway API 'list' endpoints. Specifically, the `BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS` dictionary in `mlflow/server/auth/__init__.py` does not include entries for `ListGatewaySecretInfos`, `ListGatewayEndpoints`, and `ListGatewayModelDefinitions`. This allows any authenticated user, regardless of their assigned permissions, to enumerate all gateway secrets, endpoints, and model definitions. This vulnerability exposes sensitive information, such as API keys, endpoint configurations, and proprietary model definitions, to unauthorized users.
References
security@huntr.devhttps://huntr.com/bounties/e57db731-97d3-40c3-a429-831ee959807fExploit, Third Party Advisory
134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0https://huntr.com/bounties/e57db731-97d3-40c3-a429-831ee959807fExploit, Third Party Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
lfprojects mlflow 3.9.0
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "mlflow/mlflow",
          "vendor": "mlflow",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "latest",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@huntr.dev"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:lfprojects:mlflow:3.9.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "454B4D36-BE89-42E7-A901-19B4DD7F4AC5",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "MLflow 3.9.0 with basic-auth (`--app-name basic-auth`) fails to enforce authorization checks for multiple Gateway API \u0027list\u0027 endpoints. Specifically, the `BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS` dictionary in `mlflow/server/auth/__init__.py` does not include entries for `ListGatewaySecretInfos`, `ListGatewayEndpoints`, and `ListGatewayModelDefinitions`. This allows any authenticated user, regardless of their assigned permissions, to enumerate all gateway secrets, endpoints, and model definitions. This vulnerability exposes sensitive information, such as API keys, endpoint configurations, and proprietary model definitions, to unauthorized users."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "MLflow 3.9.0 con autenticaci\u00f3n b\u00e1sica (\u0027--app-name basic-auth\u0027) no aplica las comprobaciones de autorizaci\u00f3n para m\u00faltiples puntos finales  list  de la API de Gateway. Espec\u00edficamente, el diccionario \u0027BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS\u0027 en \u0027mlflow/server/auth/__init__.py\u0027 no incluye entradas para \u0027ListGatewaySecretInfos\u0027, \u0027ListGatewayEndpoints\u0027 y \u0027ListGatewayModelDefinitions\u0027. Esto permite a cualquier usuario autenticado, independientemente de sus permisos asignados, enumerar todos los secretos, puntos finales y definiciones de modelos de la pasarela. Esta vulnerabilidad expone informaci\u00f3n sensible, como claves de API, configuraciones de puntos finales y definiciones de modelos propietarios, a usuarios no autorizados."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-3198",
  "lastModified": "2026-07-21T19:10:00.107",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV30": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "security@huntr.dev",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-3198",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "poc"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-06-02T13:32:18.258552Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-06-02T04:17:03.397",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@huntr.dev",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/e57db731-97d3-40c3-a429-831ee959807f"
    },
    {
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/e57db731-97d3-40c3-a429-831ee959807f"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@huntr.dev",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-284"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@huntr.dev",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.