FKIE_CVE-2026-31769

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-01 15:16 - Updated: 2026-05-11 17:56
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gpib: fix use-after-free in IO ioctl handlers The IBRD, IBWRT, IBCMD, and IBWAIT ioctl handlers use a gpib_descriptor pointer after board->big_gpib_mutex has been released. A concurrent IBCLOSEDEV ioctl can free the descriptor via close_dev_ioctl() during this window, causing a use-after-free. The IO handlers (read_ioctl, write_ioctl, command_ioctl) explicitly release big_gpib_mutex before calling their handler. wait_ioctl() is called with big_gpib_mutex held, but ibwait() releases it internally when wait_mask is non-zero. In all four cases, the descriptor pointer obtained from handle_to_descriptor() becomes unprotected. Fix this by introducing a kernel-only descriptor_busy reference count in struct gpib_descriptor. Each handler atomically increments descriptor_busy under file_priv->descriptors_mutex before releasing the lock, and decrements it when done. close_dev_ioctl() checks descriptor_busy under the same lock and rejects the close with -EBUSY if the count is non-zero. A reference count rather than a simple flag is necessary because multiple handlers can operate on the same descriptor concurrently (e.g. IBRD and IBWAIT on the same handle from different threads). A separate counter is needed because io_in_progress can be cleared from unprivileged userspace via the IBWAIT ioctl (through general_ibstatus() with set_mask containing CMPL), which would allow an attacker to bypass a check based solely on io_in_progress. The new descriptor_busy counter is only modified by the kernel IO paths. The lock ordering is consistent (big_gpib_mutex -> descriptors_mutex) and the handlers only hold descriptors_mutex briefly during the lookup, so there is no deadlock risk and no impact on IO throughput.

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "C9DF8BCE-36D3-475D-9D21-19E4F02F9029",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.18.22",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "0A2B9540-02D5-41B4-B16A-82AF66FD4F36",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.19.12",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.19",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F253B622-8837-4245-BCE5-A7BF8FC76A16",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "4AE85AD8-4641-4E7C-A2F4-305E2CD9EE64",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F666C8D8-6538-46D4-B318-87610DE64C34",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "02259FDA-961B-47BC-AE7F-93D7EC6E90C2",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "58A9FEFF-C040-420D-8F0A-BFDAAA1DF258",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "1D2315C0-D46F-4F85-9754-F9E5E11374A6",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ngpib: fix use-after-free in IO ioctl handlers\n\nThe IBRD, IBWRT, IBCMD, and IBWAIT ioctl handlers use a gpib_descriptor\npointer after board-\u003ebig_gpib_mutex has been released.  A concurrent\nIBCLOSEDEV ioctl can free the descriptor via close_dev_ioctl() during\nthis window, causing a use-after-free.\n\nThe IO handlers (read_ioctl, write_ioctl, command_ioctl) explicitly\nrelease big_gpib_mutex before calling their handler.  wait_ioctl() is\ncalled with big_gpib_mutex held, but ibwait() releases it internally\nwhen wait_mask is non-zero.  In all four cases, the descriptor pointer\nobtained from handle_to_descriptor() becomes unprotected.\n\nFix this by introducing a kernel-only descriptor_busy reference count\nin struct gpib_descriptor.  Each handler atomically increments\ndescriptor_busy under file_priv-\u003edescriptors_mutex before releasing the\nlock, and decrements it when done.  close_dev_ioctl() checks\ndescriptor_busy under the same lock and rejects the close with -EBUSY\nif the count is non-zero.\n\nA reference count rather than a simple flag is necessary because\nmultiple handlers can operate on the same descriptor concurrently\n(e.g. IBRD and IBWAIT on the same handle from different threads).\n\nA separate counter is needed because io_in_progress can be cleared from\nunprivileged userspace via the IBWAIT ioctl (through general_ibstatus()\nwith set_mask containing CMPL), which would allow an attacker to bypass\na check based solely on io_in_progress.  The new descriptor_busy\ncounter is only modified by the kernel IO paths.\n\nThe lock ordering is consistent (big_gpib_mutex -\u003e descriptors_mutex)\nand the handlers only hold descriptors_mutex briefly during the lookup,\nso there is no deadlock risk and no impact on IO throughput."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-31769",
  "lastModified": "2026-05-11T17:56:52.220",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.8,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-05-01T15:16:40.090",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/28c75dd143ead62e0dfac564c79d251e21d5d74b"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cae26eff1b56d78bed7873cf3e60a2b1bdd4da6c"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1857f8296dceb75d00ab857fc3c61bc00c7f5c6"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-416"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…