FKIE_CVE-2026-29169
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-04 15:16 - Updated: 2026-10-25 23:10| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache | http_server | * |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Apache HTTP Server",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.4.66",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:http_server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8FF781BA-CF81-400B-A155-4DAE0BD856EE",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.4.67",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A NULL pointer dereference in mod_dav_lock in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.66 and earlier may allow an attacker to crash the server with a malicious request.mod_dav_lock is not used internally by mod_dav or mod_dav_fs.\n\nThe only known use-case for mod_dav_lock was mod_dav_svn from Apache Subversion earlier than version 1.2.0.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.66, which fixes this issue, or remove mod_dav_lock."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Una desreferencia de puntero NULL en mod_dav_lock en Servidor HTTP Apache 2.4.66 y anteriores puede permitir a un atacante bloquear el servidor con una solicitud maliciosa. mod_dav_lock no es utilizado internamente por mod_dav o mod_dav_fs.\n\nEl \u00fanico caso de uso conocido para mod_dav_lock era mod_dav_svn de Apache Subversion anterior a la versi\u00f3n 1.2.0.\n\nSe recomienda a los usuarios actualizar a la versi\u00f3n 2.4.66, que corrige este problema, o eliminar mod_dav_lock."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-29169",
"lastModified": "2026-10-25T23:10:00.167",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-29169",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-04T15:52:40.756863Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-05-04T15:16:03.720",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/04/20"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/05/12"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-476"
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.