FKIE_CVE-2026-28385
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-06-26 17:16 - Updated: 2026-10-25 17:10
Severity
Summary
In Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.9, a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the image import functionality allows authenticated users with the can_create_images entitlement to interact with internal network infrastructure via the /images endpoint. When importing an image from a URL source, the LXD daemon fails to validate or restrict outbound destination IP addresses, allowing connections to loopback, RFC1918 private ranges, and cloud metadata endpoints. This enables error-based port scanning and unauthorized interaction with internal HTTP services from the daemon's network position.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| security@ubuntu.com | https://github.com/canonical/lxd/pull/18462 | Issue Tracking, Patch | |
| security@ubuntu.com | https://github.com/canonical/lxd/security/advisories/GHSA-3gq2-x4qg-p4g6 | Exploit, Vendor Advisory, Mitigation |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com/canonical",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "lxd",
"platforms": [
"Linux"
],
"product": "lxd",
"programFiles": [
"permissions.go"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/canonical/lxd",
"vendor": "Canonical",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@ubuntu.com"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:canonical:lxd:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "96A991F9-74FE-4B09-B5F9-C503F94E1D75",
"versionEndIncluding": "6.9",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.12",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.9, a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the image import functionality allows authenticated users with the can_create_images entitlement to interact with internal network infrastructure via the /images endpoint. When importing an image from a URL source, the LXD daemon fails to validate or restrict outbound destination IP addresses, allowing connections to loopback, RFC1918 private ranges, and cloud metadata endpoints. This enables error-based port scanning and unauthorized interaction with internal HTTP services from the daemon\u0027s network position."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En las versiones de Canonical LXD 4.12 a 6.9, una vulnerabilidad de falsificaci\u00f3n de petici\u00f3n del lado del servidor (SSRF) en la funcionalidad de importaci\u00f3n de im\u00e1genes permite a los usuarios autenticados con el derecho \u2019can_create_images\u2019 interactuar con la infraestructura de red interna a trav\u00e9s del endpoint /images. Al importar una imagen desde una fuente URL, el demonio LXD no valida ni restringe las direcciones IP de destino salientes, permitiendo conexiones a loopback, rangos privados RFC1918 y endpoints de metadatos de la nube. Esto permite el escaneo de puertos basado en errores y la interacci\u00f3n no autorizada con servicios HTTP internos desde la posici\u00f3n de red del demonio."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-28385",
"lastModified": "2026-10-25T17:10:00.197",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.1,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "security@ubuntu.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-28385",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-26T17:13:30.913771Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-06-26T17:16:32.430",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@ubuntu.com",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/canonical/lxd/pull/18462"
},
{
"source": "security@ubuntu.com",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Vendor Advisory",
"Mitigation"
],
"url": "https://github.com/canonical/lxd/security/advisories/GHSA-3gq2-x4qg-p4g6"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@ubuntu.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-918"
}
],
"source": "security@ubuntu.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.