FKIE_CVE-2026-2290

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-21 04:16 - Updated: 2026-04-22 21:32
Summary
The Post Affiliate Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.28.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access, to make web requests to initiate arbitrary outbound requests from the application and read the returned response content. Successful exploitation was confirmed by receiving and observing response data from an external Collaborator endpoint.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Post Affiliate Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.28.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access, to make web requests to initiate arbitrary outbound requests from the application and read the returned response content. Successful exploitation was confirmed by receiving and observing response data from an external Collaborator endpoint."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El plugin Post Affiliate Pro para WordPress es vulnerable a la falsificaci\u00f3n de petici\u00f3n del lado del servidor en todas las versiones hasta la 1.28.0, inclusive. Esto hace posible que atacantes autenticados, con acceso de nivel de Administrador, realicen peticiones web para iniciar peticiones salientes arbitrarias desde la aplicaci\u00f3n y leer el contenido de la respuesta devuelta. La explotaci\u00f3n exitosa fue confirmada al recibir y observar datos de respuesta desde un endpoint de Collaborator externo."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-2290",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-22T21:32:08.360",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 3.8,
          "baseSeverity": "LOW",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.2,
        "impactScore": 2.5,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-03-21T04:16:58.187",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/postaffiliatepro/tags/1.28.0/Base.class.php#L127"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/postaffiliatepro/trunk/Base.class.php#L127"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/369cd6ca-bb36-479e-b342-36d2ca778ce1?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-918"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…