FKIE_CVE-2026-2263
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-04-08 00:16 - Updated: 2026-07-24 23:10| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Hustle \u2013 Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups",
"vendor": "wpmudev",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.8.10.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@wordfence.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Hustle \u2013 Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the \u0027hustle_module_converted\u0027 AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.10.2. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to forge conversion tracking events for any Hustle module, including draft modules that are never displayed to users, thereby manipulating marketing analytics and conversion statistics."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El plugin Hustle - Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups para WordPress es vulnerable a la modificaci\u00f3n no autorizada de datos debido a una comprobaci\u00f3n de capacidad faltante en la acci\u00f3n AJAX \u0027hustle_module_converted\u0027 en todas las versiones hasta, e incluyendo, la 7.8.10.2. Esto hace posible que atacantes no autenticados forjen eventos de seguimiento de conversi\u00f3n para cualquier m\u00f3dulo de Hustle, incluyendo m\u00f3dulos en borrador que nunca se muestran a los usuarios, manipulando as\u00ed los an\u00e1lisis de marketing y las estad\u00edsticas de conversi\u00f3n."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-2263",
"lastModified": "2026-07-24T23:10:00.563",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-2263",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-08T18:10:34.710486Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-04-08T00:16:04.980",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wordpress-popup/tags/7.8.9.3/inc/front/hustle-module-front-ajax.php#L1047"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wordpress-popup/tags/7.8.9.3/inc/front/hustle-module-front-ajax.php#L32"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wordpress-popup/tags/7.8.9.3/inc/front/hustle-module-front.php#L311"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?old_path=/wordpress-popup/tags/7.8.10.2\u0026new_path=/wordpress-popup/tags/7.8.11"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/2305462c-0a00-4423-8dc2-e32628c4864d?source=cve"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-862"
}
],
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.