FKIE_CVE-2026-20105

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-04 18:16 - Updated: 2026-03-05 19:39
Severity ?
7.7 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
A vulnerability in the Remote Access SSL VPN functionality of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with a valid VPN connection to exhaust device memory resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.This does not affect the management or MUS interfaces. This vulnerability is due to trusting user input without validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted packets to the Remote Access SSL VPN server. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
References
psirt@cisco.comhttps://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-asaftd-vpn-m9sx6MbC
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A vulnerability in the Remote Access SSL VPN functionality of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with a valid VPN connection to exhaust device memory resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.This does not affect the management or MUS interfaces.\r\n\r This vulnerability is due to trusting user input without validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted packets to the Remote Access SSL VPN server. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Una vulnerabilidad en la funcionalidad de VPN SSL de Acceso Remoto de Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software y Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software podr\u00eda permitir a un atacante remoto autenticado con una conexi\u00f3n VPN v\u00e1lida agotar la memoria del dispositivo, lo que resultar\u00eda en una condici\u00f3n de denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (DoS). Esto no afecta las interfaces de gesti\u00f3n o MUS. Esta vulnerabilidad se debe a confiar en la entrada del usuario sin validaci\u00f3n. Un atacante podr\u00eda explotar esta vulnerabilidad enviando paquetes manipulados al servidor VPN SSL de Acceso Remoto. Un exploit exitoso podr\u00eda permitir al atacante provocar que el dispositivo se reinicie, lo que resultar\u00eda en una condici\u00f3n de DoS."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-20105",
  "lastModified": "2026-03-05T19:39:11.967",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.7,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.1,
        "impactScore": 4.0,
        "source": "psirt@cisco.com",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-03-04T18:16:26.200",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "psirt@cisco.com",
      "url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-asaftd-vpn-m9sx6MbC"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "psirt@cisco.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-401"
        }
      ],
      "source": "psirt@cisco.com",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.