FKIE_CVE-2026-20006
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-04 18:16 - Updated: 2026-03-05 19:39
Severity ?
Summary
A vulnerability in the TLS cryptography functionality of the Snort 3 Detection Engine of Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the Snort 3 Detection Engine to unexpectedly restart, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.
This vulnerability is due to improper implementation of the TLS protocol. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted TLS packet to an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a device that is running Cisco Secure FTD Software to drop network traffic, resulting in a DoS condition.
Note: TLS 1.3 is not affected by this vulnerability.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability in the TLS cryptography functionality of the Snort 3 Detection Engine of Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the Snort 3 Detection Engine to unexpectedly restart, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.\r\n\r\nThis vulnerability is due to improper implementation of the TLS protocol. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted TLS packet to an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a device that is running Cisco Secure FTD Software to drop network traffic, resulting in a DoS condition.\u0026nbsp;\r\nNote: TLS 1.3 is not affected by this vulnerability."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Una vulnerabilidad en la funcionalidad de criptograf\u00eda TLS del motor de detecci\u00f3n Snort 3 del software Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) podr\u00eda permitir a un atacante remoto no autenticado provocar que el motor de detecci\u00f3n Snort 3 se reinicie inesperadamente, lo que resultar\u00eda en una condici\u00f3n de denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (DoS).\n\nEsta vulnerabilidad se debe a una implementaci\u00f3n incorrecta del protocolo TLS. Un atacante podr\u00eda explotar esta vulnerabilidad enviando un paquete TLS manipulado a un sistema afectado. Un exploit exitoso podr\u00eda permitir al atacante provocar que un dispositivo que ejecuta el software Cisco Secure FTD descarte el tr\u00e1fico de red, lo que resultar\u00eda en una condici\u00f3n de DoS.\nNota: TLS 1.3 no se ve afectado por esta vulnerabilidad."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-20006",
"lastModified": "2026-03-05T19:39:11.967",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "psirt@cisco.com",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-03-04T18:16:13.803",
"references": [
{
"source": "psirt@cisco.com",
"url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-ftd-tcp-dos-rHfqnwRg"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "psirt@cisco.com",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-388"
}
],
"source": "psirt@cisco.com",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…