FKIE_CVE-2026-16729

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-07-29 17:16 - Updated: 2026-07-30 16:43
Severity
4.8 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Summary
undici's setCookie function does not fully sanitize cookie attributes. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, a domain value is not checked for semicolons and entries in the unparsed array are not sanitized, so attacker-influenced input can inject additional cookie attributes. For example, a domain value containing a semicolon can append attributes such as SameSite, and an unparsed entry can inject attributes such as HttpOnly, without the caller setting them. Applications that pass user-controlled input to these fields, such as multi-tenant or reverse-proxy servers that scope session cookies to a tenant-supplied domain, can have SameSite CSRF protections bypassed, or the Secure, HttpOnly, and SameSite attributes forced, stripped, or overridden. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.
References
ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bbhttps://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html
ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bbhttps://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-v3r7-h72x-cjcm
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageURL": "pkg:npm/undici",
          "product": "undici",
          "vendor": "undici",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "6.28.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.28.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "7.29.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "7.29.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "8.9.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "8.9.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "undici\u0027s setCookie function does not fully sanitize cookie attributes. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, a domain value is not checked for semicolons and entries in the unparsed array are not sanitized, so attacker-influenced input can inject additional cookie attributes. For example, a domain value containing a semicolon can append attributes such as SameSite, and an unparsed entry can inject attributes such as HttpOnly, without the caller setting them. Applications that pass user-controlled input to these fields, such as multi-tenant or reverse-proxy servers that scope session cookies to a tenant-supplied domain, can have SameSite CSRF protections bypassed, or the Secure, HttpOnly, and SameSite attributes forced, stripped, or overridden. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-16729",
  "lastModified": "2026-07-30T16:43:03.817",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.8,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 2.5,
        "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-16729",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-07-29T18:08:05.310961Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-07-29T17:16:51.123",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
      "url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-v3r7-h72x-cjcm"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-74"
        }
      ],
      "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.