FKIE_CVE-2026-16546

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-08-04 07:16 - Updated: 2026-08-04 15:16
Severity
4.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Summary
The Wired Impact Volunteer Management WordPress plugin before 2.8.2 does not have authorisation checks in one of its AJAX actions, and does not verify that the RSVP being removed belongs to the requesting user, allowing users with a role as low as Subscriber to remove arbitrary users' RSVPs from any volunteer opportunity.
References
contact@wpscan.comhttps://wpscan.com/vulnerability/7541bc1a-a4ea-4e02-b10a-ea59708159f4/
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Wired Impact Volunteer Management",
          "vendor": "Unknown",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.8.2",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "contact@wpscan.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Wired Impact Volunteer Management WordPress plugin before 2.8.2 does not have authorisation checks in one of its AJAX actions, and does not verify that the RSVP being removed belongs to the requesting user, allowing users with a role as low as Subscriber to remove arbitrary users\u0027 RSVPs from any volunteer opportunity."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-16546",
  "lastModified": "2026-08-04T15:16:28.550",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-16546",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-08-04T14:08:51.754282Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-08-04T07:16:30.370",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "contact@wpscan.com",
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/7541bc1a-a4ea-4e02-b10a-ea59708159f4/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "contact@wpscan.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Received",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-862"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.