FKIE_CVE-2026-16063

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-08-02 06:16 - Updated: 2026-08-03 18:16
Severity
5.4 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Summary
The Event Booking Manager for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 5.3.7 does not sanitise or escape event timeline content submitted by users with post-editing access before storing it and rendering it on the public event page, allowing users with the Author role and above to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in the browser of any visitor viewing the event, including administrators.
References
contact@wpscan.comhttps://wpscan.com/vulnerability/96f20744-6751-40a3-92b7-1e93e3b736a4/
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Event Booking Manager for WooCommerce",
          "vendor": "Unknown",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "5.3.7",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "contact@wpscan.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Event Booking Manager for WooCommerce  WordPress plugin before 5.3.7 does not sanitise or escape event timeline content submitted by users with post-editing access before storing it and rendering it on the public event page, allowing users with the Author role and above to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in the browser of any visitor viewing the event, including administrators."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-16063",
  "lastModified": "2026-08-03T18:16:36.660",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.4,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.3,
        "impactScore": 2.7,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-16063",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "poc"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-08-03T17:47:16.563457Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-08-02T06:16:38.830",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "contact@wpscan.com",
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/96f20744-6751-40a3-92b7-1e93e3b736a4/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "contact@wpscan.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Received",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-79"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.