FKIE_CVE-2026-1582

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-02-18 13:16 - Updated: 2026-06-17 10:16
Severity
3.7 (Low) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Summary
The WP All Export plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.14 via the export download endpoint. This is due to a PHP type juggling vulnerability in the security token comparison which uses loose comparison (==) instead of strict comparison (===). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication using "magic hash" values when the expected MD5 hash prefix happens to be numeric-looking (matching pattern ^0e\d+$), allowing download of sensitive export files containing PII, business data, or database information.
References
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-all-export/tags/1.4.14/actions/wp_loaded.php#L19
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3455775/
security@wordfence.comhttps://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/9a92c682-b8b3-4d23-bd84-97d7440ee525?source=cve
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "WP All Export \u2013 Drag \u0026 Drop Export to Any Custom CSV, XML \u0026 Excel",
          "vendor": "soflyy",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "1.4.14",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The WP All Export plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.14 via the export download endpoint. This is due to a PHP type juggling vulnerability in the security token comparison which uses loose comparison (==) instead of strict comparison (===). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication using \"magic hash\" values when the expected MD5 hash prefix happens to be numeric-looking (matching pattern ^0e\\d+$), allowing download of sensitive export files containing PII, business data, or database information."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El plugin WP All Export para WordPress es vulnerable a la Exposici\u00f3n de Informaci\u00f3n Sensible en todas las versiones hasta la 1.4.14, inclusive, a trav\u00e9s del endpoint de descarga de exportaci\u00f3n. Esto se debe a una vulnerabilidad de manipulaci\u00f3n de tipos de PHP en la comparaci\u00f3n del token de seguridad que utiliza una comparaci\u00f3n laxa (==) en lugar de una comparaci\u00f3n estricta (===). Esto hace posible que atacantes no autenticados eludan la autenticaci\u00f3n utilizando valores de \u0027magic hash\u0027 cuando el prefijo del hash MD5 esperado resulta ser de aspecto num\u00e9rico (coincidiendo con el patr\u00f3n ^0e\\d+$), permitiendo la descarga de archivos de exportaci\u00f3n sensibles que contienen PII, datos comerciales o informaci\u00f3n de la base de datos."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-1582",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:16:06.570",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 3.7,
          "baseSeverity": "LOW",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-1582",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-02-18T20:23:21.585955Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-02-18T13:16:20.340",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-all-export/tags/1.4.14/actions/wp_loaded.php#L19"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3455775/"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/9a92c682-b8b3-4d23-bd84-97d7440ee525?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-200"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.