FKIE_CVE-2026-1530

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-02-02 06:16 - Updated: 2026-04-15 00:35
Severity ?
8.1 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Summary
A flaw was found in fog-kubevirt. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack due to disabled certificate validation. This enables the attacker to intercept and potentially alter sensitive communications between Satellite and OpenShift, resulting in information disclosure and data integrity compromise.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:5970
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:5971
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-1530
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2433784
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A flaw was found in fog-kubevirt. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack due to disabled certificate validation. This enables the attacker to intercept and potentially alter sensitive communications between Satellite and OpenShift, resulting in information disclosure and data integrity compromise."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Se encontr\u00f3 una falla en fog-kubevirt. Esta vulnerabilidad permite a un atacante remoto realizar un ataque Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) debido a la validaci\u00f3n de certificados deshabilitada. Esto permite al atacante interceptar y potencialmente alterar comunicaciones sensibles entre Satellite y OpenShift, lo que resulta en revelaci\u00f3n de informaci\u00f3n y compromiso de la integridad de los datos."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-1530",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-15T00:35:42.020",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 8.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 5.2,
        "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-02-02T06:16:20.620",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:5970"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:5971"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-1530"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2433784"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-295"
        }
      ],
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.