FKIE_CVE-2026-14961
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-07-15 18:16 - Updated: 2026-10-24 21:10| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "Tdelo64.sys",
"vendor": "Pegatron Corp.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "02-17-2025",
"status": "affected",
"version": "02-17-2025",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cret@cert.org"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Pegatron `Tdelo64.sys` exposes a privileged device interface, `\\\\.\\TdeIo`, that fails to properly restrict access to sensitive IOCTL functionality. The driver\u0027s IOCTL dispatcher does not validate caller privileges or verify user-supplied kernel memory addresses before performing memory operations. By sending crafted requests to IOCTL, a local attacker can achieve arbitrary kernel memory read and write operations, leading to privilege escalation to `NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM`, security product bypass, credential theft, or complete system compromise."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Pegatron \u2019Tdelo64.sys\u2019 expone una interfaz de dispositivo privilegiada, \u2019\\\\.\\TdeIo\u2019, que no restringe adecuadamente el acceso a la funcionalidad IOCTL sensible. El despachador IOCTL del controlador no valida los privilegios del llamador ni verifica las direcciones de memoria del kernel proporcionadas por el usuario antes de realizar operaciones de memoria. Al enviar solicitudes manipuladas a IOCTL, un atacante local puede lograr operaciones arbitrarias de lectura y escritura en la memoria del kernel, lo que lleva a la escalada de privilegios a \u2019NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM\u2019, eludir productos de seguridad, robo de credenciales o compromiso total del sistema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-14961",
"lastModified": "2026-10-24T21:10:00.130",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.2,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.5,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-14961",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-15T19:30:44.030568Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-07-15T18:16:44.640",
"references": [
{
"source": "cret@cert.org",
"url": "https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/529388"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cret@cert.org",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-20"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-269"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.