FKIE_CVE-2026-13473

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-07-17 20:17 - Updated: 2026-07-17 20:17
Summary
IBM Storage Protect Client 8.1.0.0 through 8.1.27.0, 8.1.27.1, and 8.2.0.0 through 8.2.1.0 IBM Storage Protect is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. A remote attacker could overflow a buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system or cause the server to crash.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:storage_protect_client:8.1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:storage_protect_client:8.1.27.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:storage_protect_client:8.2.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:storage_protect_client:8.2.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "product": "Storage Protect Client",
          "vendor": "IBM",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "8.1.27.0, 8.1.27.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.1.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "8.2.1.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.2.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "IBM Storage Protect Client 8.1.0.0 through 8.1.27.0, 8.1.27.1, and 8.2.0.0 through 8.2.1.0 IBM Storage Protect is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. A remote attacker could overflow a buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system or cause the server to crash."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-13473",
  "lastModified": "2026-07-17T20:17:14.827",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 8.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-07-17T20:17:14.827",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
      "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7279728"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Received"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…