FKIE_CVE-2026-118516
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-11-04 13:17 - Updated: 2026-11-09 22:18| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://packagist.org/packages/symfony/routing",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"Symfony\\Component\\Routing\\Matcher\\CompiledUrlMatcher"
],
"packageName": "symfony/routing",
"product": "symfony",
"repo": "https://github.com/symfony/routing",
"vendor": "sensiolabs",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.4.56",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.4.50",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0.0",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7.4.23",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0.0",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.1.11",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.0.0",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"source": "596c5446-0ce5-4ba2-aa66-48b3b757a647"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Symfony Routing components\u00a0CompiledUrlMatcher and UrlMatcher\u00a0interpret the host and path information differently, allowing\u00a0path-based authorization rules to be bypassed in Symfony versions prior to 5.4.56, 6.x prior to 6.4.50, 7.x prior to 7.4.23, and 8.x prior to 8.1.11.\n\n\n\n\nFor routes that define a host,\u00a0CompiledUrlMatcher\u00a0matches the string\u00a0$host.\u0027.\u0027.$pathinfo\u00a0against the host regular expression followed by the path regular expression, while\u00a0UrlMatcher\u00a0matches the host and the path separately. A\u00a0host placeholder can therefore\u00a0 match\u00a0/,\u00a0and consume the beginning of the path, so the request is routed to a controller, while\u00a0UrlMatcher\u00a0 would find no route.\u00a0Rules that look at the path, such as\u00a0access_control\u00a0entries and firewall patterns,\u00a0are evaluated against the actual request path, so they do not apply while the controller of the route runs,\u00a0potentially allowing an unauthenticated request to reach a protected controller. For example, with the route\u00a0/admin/report/{id}, the host\u00a0app.{domain}\u00a0and the rule\u00a0access_control:\u00a0[{ path: ^/admin, roles: ROLE_ADMIN }], an anonymous request for\u00a0/admin/report/1\u00a0is sent to the login page. A request with the Host header\u00a0app\u00a0and path\u00a0/x./admin/report/1\u00a0instead reaches the controller, with\u00a0domain=\"/x\". With the required\u00a0domain: .+, the real hostname works:\u00a0app.example.com\u00a0and\u00a0/x./admin/report/1\u00a0match with\u00a0domain=\"example.com./x\".\n\n\n\n\nApplications are affected if they have routes with host placeholders protected by path-based rules. With the default requirement, the Host header must be the host of the route without its last labels, such as\u00a0app: framework.trusted_hosts\u00a0blocks that, while a web server that only serves known names may not, for instance, Nginx passing the raw Host header to FastCGI for a request line that carries an absolute URI. If the requirement accepts /, such as .+, a real hostname works, and\u00a0trusted_hosts\u00a0does not help."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-118516",
"lastModified": "2026-11-09T22:18:28.437",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "596c5446-0ce5-4ba2-aa66-48b3b757a647",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-118516",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-09T21:12:52.419903Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-11-04T13:17:26.100",
"references": [
{
"source": "596c5446-0ce5-4ba2-aa66-48b3b757a647",
"url": "https://github.com/symfony/symfony/commit/067cde51e29f6d605de4de53322a02c6e23b5416"
},
{
"source": "596c5446-0ce5-4ba2-aa66-48b3b757a647",
"url": "https://github.com/symfony/symfony/security/advisories/GHSA-xqw3-x93m-887x"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "596c5446-0ce5-4ba2-aa66-48b3b757a647",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-436"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-863"
}
],
"source": "596c5446-0ce5-4ba2-aa66-48b3b757a647",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.