FKIE_CVE-2026-109191
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-10-16 05:17 - Updated: 2026-10-16 15:17
Severity
Summary
The Image Hub – Free Images from Unsplash, Pixabay, Pexels, Openverse & Giphy plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.0 via the 'image_hub_api_keys_* (6 options)' parameter. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to extract the plaintext API credentials for six third-party services — Giphy, Openverse (client ID and secret), Pexels, Pixabay, and Unsplash — emitted verbatim into every admin page's HTML via wp_localize_script. The leaked page HTML also contains a valid image_hub_nonce AJAX nonce, which — combined with the absence of any capability check in the image_hub_update_settings AJAX handler — allows the same Subscriber-level attacker to overwrite all six stored API credential options via update_option().
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Image Hub \u2013 Free Images from Unsplash, Pixabay, Pexels, Openverse \u0026 Giphy",
"vendor": "extendthemes",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.2.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@wordfence.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Image Hub \u2013 Free Images from Unsplash, Pixabay, Pexels, Openverse \u0026 Giphy plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.0 via the \u0027image_hub_api_keys_* (6 options)\u0027 parameter. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to extract the plaintext API credentials for six third-party services \u2014 Giphy, Openverse (client ID and secret), Pexels, Pixabay, and Unsplash \u2014 emitted verbatim into every admin page\u0027s HTML via wp_localize_script. The leaked page HTML also contains a valid image_hub_nonce AJAX nonce, which \u2014 combined with the absence of any capability check in the image_hub_update_settings AJAX handler \u2014 allows the same Subscriber-level attacker to overwrite all six stored API credential options via update_option()."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-109191",
"lastModified": "2026-10-16T15:17:06.477",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-109191",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-16T14:56:18.943819Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-10-16T05:17:28.967",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/image-hub/tags/1.2.0/image-hub.php#L46"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/image-hub/tags/1.2.0/inc/src/MediaModal.php#L19"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/image-hub/tags/1.2.0/inc/src/MediaModal.php#L38"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/image-hub/tags/1.2.0/inc/src/MediaModal.php#L56"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/image-hub/tags/1.2.0/inc/src/Settings.php#L23"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/image-hub/tags/1.2.0/inc/src/Settings.php#L78"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/image-hub/tags/1.2.0/inc/src/Utils.php#L11"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3745452/image-hub/trunk/inc/src/MediaModal.php"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/99d1e0cc-1fd0-47f7-8b73-33663ed72eea?source=cve"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-200"
}
],
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.