FKIE_CVE-2026-102702

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-10-13 16:17 - Updated: 2026-10-14 16:10
Severity
Summary
[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] 1) XSA-437 (CVE-2023-34321) addressed issues with overflows in calculations involved in guests flushing caches through GNTTABOP_cache_flush. Unfortunately the fix there introduced a calculation which may underflow, resulting in a loop which would - at least on 64-bit Arm - take excessively long, and which would likely eventually crash the hypervisor. This is CVE-2026-102699. 2) GNTTABOP_cache_flush may be issued on memory mapped from another domain using the grant table interface. However there was no restriction to disallow the use of invalidate-without-clean against read-only grant mappings, which may corrupt the granted memory. This is CVE-2026-102702.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "Xen",
          "vendor": "Xen",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unknown",
              "version": "consult Xen advisory XSA-519"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@xen.org"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the\ntext explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.]\n\n1) XSA-437 (CVE-2023-34321) addressed issues with overflows in\n   calculations involved in guests flushing caches through\n   GNTTABOP_cache_flush.  Unfortunately the fix there introduced a\n   calculation which may underflow, resulting in a loop which would - at\n   least on 64-bit Arm - take excessively long, and which would likely\n   eventually crash the hypervisor.\n\n   This is CVE-2026-102699.\n\n2) GNTTABOP_cache_flush may be issued on memory mapped from another\n   domain using the grant table interface.  However there was no\n   restriction to disallow the use of invalidate-without-clean against\n   read-only grant mappings, which may corrupt the granted memory.\n\n   This is CVE-2026-102702."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-102702",
  "lastModified": "2026-10-14T16:10:14.750",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2026-10-13T16:17:09.723",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@xen.org",
      "url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-519.html"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@xen.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.