FKIE_CVE-2026-102699
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-10-13 16:17 - Updated: 2026-10-14 16:10
Severity
Summary
[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the
text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.]
1) XSA-437 (CVE-2023-34321) addressed issues with overflows in
calculations involved in guests flushing caches through
GNTTABOP_cache_flush. Unfortunately the fix there introduced a
calculation which may underflow, resulting in a loop which would - at
least on 64-bit Arm - take excessively long, and which would likely
eventually crash the hypervisor.
This is CVE-2026-102699.
2) GNTTABOP_cache_flush may be issued on memory mapped from another
domain using the grant table interface. However there was no
restriction to disallow the use of invalidate-without-clean against
read-only grant mappings, which may corrupt the granted memory.
This is CVE-2026-102702.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Xen",
"vendor": "Xen",
"versions": [
{
"status": "unknown",
"version": "consult Xen advisory XSA-519"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@xen.org"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the\ntext explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.]\n\n1) XSA-437 (CVE-2023-34321) addressed issues with overflows in\n calculations involved in guests flushing caches through\n GNTTABOP_cache_flush. Unfortunately the fix there introduced a\n calculation which may underflow, resulting in a loop which would - at\n least on 64-bit Arm - take excessively long, and which would likely\n eventually crash the hypervisor.\n\n This is CVE-2026-102699.\n\n2) GNTTABOP_cache_flush may be issued on memory mapped from another\n domain using the grant table interface. However there was no\n restriction to disallow the use of invalidate-without-clean against\n read-only grant mappings, which may corrupt the granted memory.\n\n This is CVE-2026-102702."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-102699",
"lastModified": "2026-10-14T16:10:14.750",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-10-13T16:17:09.510",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@xen.org",
"url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-519.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@xen.org",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.