FKIE_CVE-2025-71126
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-01-14 15:16 - Updated: 2026-03-25 18:50
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: avoid deadlock on fallback while reinjecting
Jakub reported an MPTCP deadlock at fallback time:
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
mptcp_connect/20858 is trying to acquire lock:
ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280
but task is already holding lock:
ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&msk->fallback_lock);
lock(&msk->fallback_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
3 locks held by mptcp_connect/20858:
#0: ff1100001da18290 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x114/0x1bc0
#1: ff1100001db40fd0 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x2cb/0xaa0
#2: ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 20858 Comm: mptcp_connect Not tainted 6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xa0
print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xcd
validate_chain+0x2ff/0x5f0
__lock_acquire+0x34c/0x740
lock_acquire.part.0+0xbc/0x260
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x50
__mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280
mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x16c2/0x3050
__mptcp_retrans+0x421/0xaa0
mptcp_release_cb+0x5aa/0xa70
release_sock+0xab/0x1d0
mptcp_sendmsg+0xd5b/0x1bc0
sock_write_iter+0x281/0x4d0
new_sync_write+0x3c5/0x6f0
vfs_write+0x65e/0xbb0
ksys_write+0x17e/0x200
do_syscall_64+0xbb/0xfd0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
RIP: 0033:0x7fa5627cbc5e
Code: 4d 89 d8 e8 14 bd 00 00 4c 8b 5d f8 41 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 74 11 c9 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 8b 45 10 0f 05 <c9> c3 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 e7 e8 13 ff ff ff 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa
RSP: 002b:00007fff1fe14700 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 00007fa5627cbc5e
RDX: 0000000000001f9c RSI: 00007fff1fe16984 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007fff1fe14710 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fff1fe16920
R13: 0000000000002000 R14: 0000000000001f9c R15: 0000000000001f9c
The packet scheduler could attempt a reinjection after receiving an
MP_FAIL and before the infinite map has been transmitted, causing a
deadlock since MPTCP needs to do the reinjection atomically from WRT
fallback.
Address the issue explicitly avoiding the reinjection in the critical
scenario. Note that this is the only fallback critical section that
could potentially send packets and hit the double-lock.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.16 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.19 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.19 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.19 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.19 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.19 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.19 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.19 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.19 |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A82FD07D-EDB4-49EC-8123-407B5046415D",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.160",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.1.149",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "03D395F6-2EB4-4D8F-8750-7294B02A75E7",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.120",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.6.101",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "3A463EA9-8294-45DB-A398-3B7860CDF976",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.64",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.12.40",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EA66C243-6DF2-4727-A595-DD89F076A762",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.16",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.15.8",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8F519034-DE85-479C-A073-22A202B0A1BE",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.18.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.16.1",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16:-:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6238B17D-C12B-458F-A138-97039BFC4595",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.19:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "17B67AA7-40D6-4AFA-8459-F200F3D7CFD1",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.19:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C47E4CC9-C826-4FA9-B014-7FE3D9B318B2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.19:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F71D92C0-C023-48BD-B3B6-70B638EEE298",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.19:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "13580667-0A98-40CC-B29F-D12790B91BDB",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.19:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "CAD1FED7-CF48-47BF-AC7D-7B6FA3C065FC",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.19:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "3EF854A1-ABB1-4E93-BE9A-44569EC76C0D",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.19:rc7:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F5DC0CA6-F0AF-4DDF-A882-3DADB9A886A7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.19:rc8:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EB5B7DFC-C36B-45D8-922C-877569FDDF43",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmptcp: avoid deadlock on fallback while reinjecting\n\nJakub reported an MPTCP deadlock at fallback time:\n\n WARNING: possible recursive locking detected\n 6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 Not tainted\n --------------------------------------------\n mptcp_connect/20858 is trying to acquire lock:\n ff1100001da18b60 (\u0026msk-\u003efallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280\n\n but task is already holding lock:\n ff1100001da18b60 (\u0026msk-\u003efallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0\n\n other info that might help us debug this:\n Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n CPU0\n ----\n lock(\u0026msk-\u003efallback_lock);\n lock(\u0026msk-\u003efallback_lock);\n\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n May be due to missing lock nesting notation\n\n 3 locks held by mptcp_connect/20858:\n #0: ff1100001da18290 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x114/0x1bc0\n #1: ff1100001db40fd0 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x2cb/0xaa0\n #2: ff1100001da18b60 (\u0026msk-\u003efallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0\n\n stack backtrace:\n CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 20858 Comm: mptcp_connect Not tainted 6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 PREEMPT(full)\n Hardware name: Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xa0\n print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xcd\n validate_chain+0x2ff/0x5f0\n __lock_acquire+0x34c/0x740\n lock_acquire.part.0+0xbc/0x260\n _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x50\n __mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280\n mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x16c2/0x3050\n __mptcp_retrans+0x421/0xaa0\n mptcp_release_cb+0x5aa/0xa70\n release_sock+0xab/0x1d0\n mptcp_sendmsg+0xd5b/0x1bc0\n sock_write_iter+0x281/0x4d0\n new_sync_write+0x3c5/0x6f0\n vfs_write+0x65e/0xbb0\n ksys_write+0x17e/0x200\n do_syscall_64+0xbb/0xfd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53\n RIP: 0033:0x7fa5627cbc5e\n Code: 4d 89 d8 e8 14 bd 00 00 4c 8b 5d f8 41 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 74 11 c9 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 8b 45 10 0f 05 \u003cc9\u003e c3 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 e7 e8 13 ff ff ff 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa\n RSP: 002b:00007fff1fe14700 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001\n RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 00007fa5627cbc5e\n RDX: 0000000000001f9c RSI: 00007fff1fe16984 RDI: 0000000000000005\n RBP: 00007fff1fe14710 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fff1fe16920\n R13: 0000000000002000 R14: 0000000000001f9c R15: 0000000000001f9c\n\nThe packet scheduler could attempt a reinjection after receiving an\nMP_FAIL and before the infinite map has been transmitted, causing a\ndeadlock since MPTCP needs to do the reinjection atomically from WRT\nfallback.\n\nAddress the issue explicitly avoiding the reinjection in the critical\nscenario. Note that this is the only fallback critical section that\ncould potentially send packets and hit the double-lock."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, la siguiente vulnerabilidad ha sido resuelta:\n\nmptcp: evitar interbloqueo en el fallback mientras se reinjecta\n\nJakub inform\u00f3 un interbloqueo MPTCP en el momento del fallback:\n\n WARNING: possible recursive locking detected\n 6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 Not tainted\n --------------------------------------------\n mptcp_connect/20858 is trying to acquire lock:\n ff1100001da18b60 (\u0026amp;msk-\u0026gt;fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280\n\n but task is already holding lock:\n ff1100001da18b60 (\u0026amp;msk-\u0026gt;fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0\n\n other info that might help us debug this:\n Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n CPU0\n ----\n lock(\u0026amp;msk-\u0026gt;fallback_lock);\n lock(\u0026amp;msk-\u0026gt;fallback_lock);\n\n * DEADLOCK *\n\n May be due to missing lock nesting notation\n\n 3 locks held by mptcp_connect/20858:\n #0: ff1100001da18290 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x114/0x1bc0\n #1: ff1100001db40fd0 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x2cb/0xaa0\n #2: ff1100001da18b60 (\u0026amp;msk-\u0026gt;fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0\n\n stack backtrace:\n CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 20858 Comm: mptcp_connect Not tainted 6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 PREEMPT(full)\n Hardware name: Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011\n Call Trace:\n \n dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xa0\n print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xcd\n validate_chain+0x2ff/0x5f0\n __lock_acquire+0x34c/0x740\n lock_acquire.part.0+0xbc/0x260\n _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x50\n __mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280\n mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x16c2/0x3050\n __mptcp_retrans+0x421/0xaa0\n mptcp_release_cb+0x5aa/0xa70\n release_sock+0xab/0x1d0\n mptcp_sendmsg+0xd5b/0x1bc0\n sock_write_iter+0x281/0x4d0\n new_sync_write+0x3c5/0x6f0\n vfs_write+0x65e/0xbb0\n ksys_write+0x17e/0x200\n do_syscall_64+0xbb/0xfd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53\n RIP: 0033:0x7fa5627cbc5e\n Code: 4d 89 d8 e8 14 bd 00 00 4c 8b 5d f8 41 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 74 11 c9 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 8b 45 10 0f 05 c3 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 e7 e8 13 ff ff ff 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa\n RSP: 002b:00007fff1fe14700 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001\n RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 00007fa5627cbc5e\n RDX: 0000000000001f9c RSI: 00007fff1fe16984 RDI: 0000000000000005\n RBP: 00007fff1fe14710 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fff1fe16920\n R13: 0000000000002000 R14: 0000000000001f9c R15: 0000000000001f9c\n\nEl planificador de paquetes podr\u00eda intentar una reinyecci\u00f3n despu\u00e9s de recibir un MP_FAIL y antes de que se haya transmitido el mapa infinito, causando un interbloqueo ya que MPTCP necesita realizar la reinyecci\u00f3n at\u00f3micamente con respecto al fallback.\n\nAbordar el problema evitando expl\u00edcitamente la reinyecci\u00f3n en el escenario cr\u00edtico. Tenga en cuenta que esta es la \u00fanica secci\u00f3n cr\u00edtica de fallback que podr\u00eda potencialmente enviar paquetes y alcanzar el doble bloqueo."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-71126",
"lastModified": "2026-03-25T18:50:29.743",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-01-14T15:16:02.317",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0107442e82c0f8d6010e07e6030741c59c520d6e"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ca9fb4335e726dab4f23b3bfe87271d8f005f41"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/252892d5a6a2f163ce18f32716e46fa4da7d4e79"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/50f47c02be419bf0a3ae94c118addf67beef359f"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ffb8c27b0539dd90262d1021488e7817fae57c42"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-667"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…