FKIE_CVE-2025-69517

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-01-28 16:16 - Updated: 2026-02-02 23:16
Severity ?
8.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
An HTML injection vulnerability in Amidaware Inc Tactical RMM v1.3.1 and earlier allows authenticated users to inject arbitrary HTML content during the creation of a new agent via the POST /api/v3/newagent/ endpoint. The agent_id parameter accepts up to 255 characters and is improperly sanitized using DOMPurify.sanitize() with the html: true option enabled, which fails to adequately filter HTML input. The injected HTML is rendered in the Tactical RMM management panel when an administrator attempts to remove or shut down the affected agent, potentially leading to client-side attacks such as UI manipulation or phishing. NOTE: the Supplier's position is that this has incorrect information.
References
cve@mitre.orghttps://gist.github.com/NtGabrielGomes/fdabcd9e85d841c5490739686e0f8b72
cve@mitre.orghttps://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm
cve@mitre.orghttps://www.amidaware.com/
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [
    {
      "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "disputed"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "An HTML injection vulnerability in Amidaware Inc Tactical RMM v1.3.1 and earlier allows authenticated users to inject arbitrary HTML content during the creation of a new agent via the POST /api/v3/newagent/ endpoint. The agent_id parameter accepts up to 255 characters and is improperly sanitized using DOMPurify.sanitize() with the html: true option enabled, which fails to adequately filter HTML input. The injected HTML is rendered in the Tactical RMM management panel when an administrator attempts to remove or shut down the affected agent, potentially leading to client-side attacks such as UI manipulation or phishing. NOTE: the Supplier\u0027s position is that this has incorrect information."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-69517",
  "lastModified": "2026-02-02T23:16:01.190",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 8.8,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-01-28T16:16:15.610",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://gist.github.com/NtGabrielGomes/fdabcd9e85d841c5490739686e0f8b72"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://github.com/amidaware/tacticalrmm"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://www.amidaware.com/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-94"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.