FKIE_CVE-2025-68438
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-01-16 11:16 - Updated: 2026-01-21 13:44
Severity ?
Summary
In Apache Airflow versions before 3.1.6, when rendered template fields in a Dag exceed [core] max_templated_field_length, sensitive values could be exposed in cleartext in the Rendered Templates UI. This occurred because serialization of those fields used a secrets masker instance that did not include user-registered mask_secret() patterns, so secrets were not reliably masked before truncation and display.
Users are recommended to upgrade to 3.1.6 or later, which fixes this issue
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| security@apache.org | https://lists.apache.org/thread/55n7b4nlsz3vo5n4h5lrj9bfsk8ctyff | Mailing List, Vendor Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/01/15/5 | Mailing List, Third Party Advisory |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:airflow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "3200C37B-AA6B-4DDC-9CFB-93D59243BF2A",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.1.6",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.1.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In Apache Airflow versions before 3.1.6, when rendered template fields in a Dag exceed [core]\u00a0max_templated_field_length, sensitive values could be exposed in cleartext in the Rendered Templates UI. This occurred because serialization of those fields used a secrets masker instance that did not include user-registered mask_secret() patterns, so secrets were not reliably masked before truncation and display.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to 3.1.6 or later, which fixes this issue"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En versiones de Apache Airflow anteriores a la 3.1.6, cuando los campos de plantilla renderizados en un DAG exceden [core] max_templated_field_length, valores sensibles podr\u00edan quedar expuestos en texto claro en la interfaz de usuario de Plantillas Renderizadas. Esto ocurri\u00f3 porque la serializaci\u00f3n de esos campos utilizaba una instancia de enmascarador de secretos que no inclu\u00eda patrones mask_secret() registrados por el usuario, por lo que los secretos no se enmascaraban de forma fiable antes de la truncaci\u00f3n y visualizaci\u00f3n.\n\nSe recomienda a los usuarios actualizar a la 3.1.6 o posterior, lo que corrige este problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-68438",
"lastModified": "2026-01-21T13:44:43.577",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-01-16T11:16:03.760",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/55n7b4nlsz3vo5n4h5lrj9bfsk8ctyff"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/01/15/5"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-200"
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…