FKIE_CVE-2025-68337
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-12-22 17:16 - Updated: 2026-10-15 02:18| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/jbd2/transaction.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "71bbe06c40fc59b5b15661eca8ff307f4176d7f9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "470decc613ab2048b619a01028072d932d9086ee",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ed62fd8c15d41c4127ad16b8219b63124f5962bc",
"status": "affected",
"version": "470decc613ab2048b619a01028072d932d9086ee",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3faac6531d4818cd6be45e5bbf32937bbbc795c0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "470decc613ab2048b619a01028072d932d9086ee",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "b4f8eabf6d991bd41fabcdf9302c4b3eab590cf4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "470decc613ab2048b619a01028072d932d9086ee",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a2a7f854d154a3e9232fec80782dad951655f52f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "470decc613ab2048b619a01028072d932d9086ee",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "bf34c72337e40c4670cceeb79b353356933a254b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "470decc613ab2048b619a01028072d932d9086ee",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "aa1703f3f706ea0867fb1991dcac709c9ec94cfb",
"status": "affected",
"version": "470decc613ab2048b619a01028072d932d9086ee",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "986835bf4d11032bba4ab8414d18fce038c61bb4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "470decc613ab2048b619a01028072d932d9086ee",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/jbd2/transaction.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.19"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.19",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.248",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.198",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.160",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.120",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.62",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.17.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.17.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.19",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
},
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.7",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.7",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.7",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.7",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.7",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\njbd2: avoid bug_on in jbd2_journal_get_create_access() when file system corrupted\n\nThere\u0027s issue when file system corrupted:\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nkernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1289!\nOops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI\nCPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 2031 Comm: mkdir Not tainted 6.18.0-rc1-next\nRIP: 0010:jbd2_journal_get_create_access+0x3b6/0x4d0\nRSP: 0018:ffff888117aafa30 EFLAGS: 00010202\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811a86b000 RCX: ffffffff89a63534\nRDX: 1ffff110200ec602 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888100763010\nRBP: ffff888100763000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff888100763028\nR10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: ffff88812c432000 R14: ffff88812c608000 R15: ffff888120bfc000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f91d6970c99 CR3: 00000001159c4000 CR4: 00000000000006f0\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n __ext4_journal_get_create_access+0x42/0x170\n ext4_getblk+0x319/0x6f0\n ext4_bread+0x11/0x100\n ext4_append+0x1e6/0x4a0\n ext4_init_new_dir+0x145/0x1d0\n ext4_mkdir+0x326/0x920\n vfs_mkdir+0x45c/0x740\n do_mkdirat+0x234/0x2f0\n __x64_sys_mkdir+0xd6/0x120\n do_syscall_64+0x5f/0xfa0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n\nThe above issue occurs with us in errors=continue mode when accompanied by\nstorage failures. There have been many inconsistencies in the file system\ndata.\nIn the case of file system data inconsistency, for example, if the block\nbitmap of a referenced block is not set, it can lead to the situation where\na block being committed is allocated and used again. As a result, the\nfollowing condition will not be satisfied then trigger BUG_ON. Of course,\nit is entirely possible to construct a problematic image that can trigger\nthis BUG_ON through specific operations. In fact, I have constructed such\nan image and easily reproduced this issue.\nTherefore, J_ASSERT() holds true only under ideal conditions, but it may\nnot necessarily be satisfied in exceptional scenarios. Using J_ASSERT()\ndirectly in abnormal situations would cause the system to crash, which is\nclearly not what we want. So here we directly trigger a JBD abort instead\nof immediately invoking BUG_ON."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad:\n\njbd2: evitar bug_on en jbd2_journal_get_create_access() cuando el sistema de archivos est\u00e1 corrupto\n\nExiste un problema cuando el sistema de archivos est\u00e1 corrupto:\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nkernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1289!\nOops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI\nCPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 2031 Comm: mkdir Not tainted 6.18.0-rc1-next\nRIP: 0010:jbd2_journal_get_create_access+0x3b6/0x4d0\nRSP: 0018:ffff888117aafa30 EFLAGS: 00010202\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811a86b000 RCX: ffffffff89a63534\nRDX: 1ffff110200ec602 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888100763010\nRBP: ffff888100763000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff888100763028\nR10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: ffff88812c432000 R14: ffff88812c608000 R15: ffff888120bfc000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f91d6970c99 CR3: 00000001159c4000 CR4: 00000000000006f0\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n __ext4_journal_get_create_access+0x42/0x170\n ext4_getblk+0x319/0x6f0\n ext4_bread+0x11/0x100\n ext4_append+0x1e6/0x4a0\n ext4_init_new_dir+0x145/0x1d0\n ext4_mkdir+0x326/0x920\n vfs_mkdir+0x45c/0x740\n do_mkdirat+0x234/0x2f0\n __x64_sys_mkdir+0xd6/0x120\n do_syscall_64+0x5f/0xfa0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n\nEl problema anterior nos ocurre en modo errors=continue cuando se acompa\u00f1a de fallos de almacenamiento. Ha habido muchas inconsistencias en los datos del sistema de archivos.\nEn caso de inconsistencia de datos del sistema de archivos, por ejemplo, si el mapa de bits de bloque de un bloque referenciado no est\u00e1 configurado, puede llevar a la situaci\u00f3n en la que un bloque que se est\u00e1 confirmando se asigna y se usa de nuevo. Como resultado, la siguiente condici\u00f3n no se cumplir\u00e1 y luego activar\u00e1 BUG_ON. Por supuesto, es totalmente posible construir una imagen problem\u00e1tica que pueda activar este BUG_ON mediante operaciones espec\u00edficas. De hecho, he construido una imagen as\u00ed y he reproducido f\u00e1cilmente este problema.\nPor lo tanto, J_ASSERT() solo es v\u00e1lido bajo condiciones ideales, pero puede que no se cumpla necesariamente en escenarios excepcionales. Usar J_ASSERT() directamente en situaciones anormales provocar\u00eda que el sistema se bloquee, lo cual claramente no es lo que queremos. As\u00ed que aqu\u00ed activamos directamente una interrupci\u00f3n de JBD en lugar de invocar inmediatamente BUG_ON."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-68337",
"lastModified": "2026-10-15T02:18:11.753",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-68337",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-16T16:56:17.316148Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-12-22T17:16:01.463",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3faac6531d4818cd6be45e5bbf32937bbbc795c0"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/71bbe06c40fc59b5b15661eca8ff307f4176d7f9"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/986835bf4d11032bba4ab8414d18fce038c61bb4"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2a7f854d154a3e9232fec80782dad951655f52f"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aa1703f3f706ea0867fb1991dcac709c9ec94cfb"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4f8eabf6d991bd41fabcdf9302c4b3eab590cf4"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bf34c72337e40c4670cceeb79b353356933a254b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ed62fd8c15d41c4127ad16b8219b63124f5962bc"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.html"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-457936.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.