FKIE_CVE-2025-66172

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-08 13:16 - Updated: 2026-09-30 22:10
Summary
The CloudStack Backup plugin has an improper access logic in versions 4.21.0.0 and 4.22.0.0. Anyone with authenticated user-account access in CloudStack 4.21.0.0+ environments, where this plugin is enabled and have access to specific APIs can restore a volume from any other user's backups and attach the volume to their own VMs. Backup plugin users using CloudStack 4.21.0.0+ are recommended to upgrade to CloudStack version 4.22.0.1, which fixes this issue.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
apache cloudstack *

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Apache CloudStack",
          "vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "4.22.0.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "4.21.0.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@apache.org"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:cloudstack:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "78690ED1-C4B3-4DC9-9B53-FB31D6D17125",
              "versionEndExcluding": "4.22.0.1",
              "versionStartIncluding": "4.21.0.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The CloudStack Backup plugin has an improper access logic in versions 4.21.0.0 and 4.22.0.0. Anyone with authenticated user-account access in CloudStack 4.21.0.0+ environments, where this plugin is enabled and have access to specific APIs can restore a volume from any other user\u0027s backups and attach the volume to their own VMs.\n\nBackup plugin users using CloudStack 4.21.0.0+ are recommended to upgrade to CloudStack version 4.22.0.1, which fixes this issue."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El plugin de copia de seguridad de CloudStack tiene una l\u00f3gica de acceso inadecuada en las versiones 4.21.0.0 y 4.22.0.0. Cualquier persona con acceso autenticado a una cuenta de usuario en entornos CloudStack 4.21.0.0+, donde este plugin est\u00e1 habilitado y tiene acceso a APIs espec\u00edficas, puede restaurar un volumen desde las copias de seguridad de cualquier otro usuario y adjuntar el volumen a sus propias VMs.\n\nSe recomienda a los usuarios del plugin de copia de seguridad que utilizan CloudStack 4.21.0.0+ actualizar a la versi\u00f3n 4.22.0.1 de CloudStack, que soluciona este problema."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-66172",
  "lastModified": "2026-09-30T22:10:00.273",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 8.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 5.2,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-66172",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-05-09T03:55:52.793975Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-05-08T13:16:35.607",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/n8mt5b7wkpysstb8w7rr9f02kc5cq2xm"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/09/3"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-359"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…