FKIE_CVE-2025-65564
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-12-18 19:16 - Updated: 2026-10-13 11:10
Severity
Summary
A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the omec-upf (upf-epc-pfcpiface) in version upf-epc-pfcpiface:2.1.3-dev. When the UPF receives a PFCP Association Setup Request that is missing the mandatory Recovery Time Stamp Information Element, the association setup handler dereferences a nil pointer via IE.RecoveryTimeStamp() instead of validating the message. This results in a panic and terminates the UPF process. An attacker who can send PFCP Association Setup Request messages to the UPF's N4/PFCP endpoint can exploit this issue to repeatedly crash the UPF and disrupt user-plane services.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| cve@mitre.org | https://github.com/omec-project/upf/issues/956 | Exploit, Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory | |
| cve@mitre.org | https://github.com/omec-project/upf/pull/964 | Issue Tracking | |
| 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0 | https://github.com/omec-project/upf/issues/956 | Exploit, Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory |
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| opennetworking | upf | 2.1.3 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cve@mitre.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:opennetworking:upf:2.1.3:dev:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E580395D-12BF-4D0A-AA6F-FD59C36E1EED",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the omec-upf (upf-epc-pfcpiface) in version upf-epc-pfcpiface:2.1.3-dev. When the UPF receives a PFCP Association Setup Request that is missing the mandatory Recovery Time Stamp Information Element, the association setup handler dereferences a nil pointer via IE.RecoveryTimeStamp() instead of validating the message. This results in a panic and terminates the UPF process. An attacker who can send PFCP Association Setup Request messages to the UPF\u0027s N4/PFCP endpoint can exploit this issue to repeatedly crash the UPF and disrupt user-plane services."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Existe una vulnerabilidad de denegaci\u00f3n de servicio en el omec-upf (upf-epc-pfcpiface) en la versi\u00f3n upf-epc-pfcpiface:2.1.3-dev. Cuando el UPF recibe una solicitud de configuraci\u00f3n de asociaci\u00f3n PFCP a la que le falta el elemento de informaci\u00f3n obligatorio \u0027Recovery Time Stamp\u0027, el gestor de configuraci\u00f3n de asociaci\u00f3n desreferencia un puntero nulo a trav\u00e9s de IE.RecoveryTimeStamp() en lugar de validar el mensaje. Esto resulta en un p\u00e1nico y termina el proceso del UPF. Un atacante que puede enviar mensajes de solicitud de configuraci\u00f3n de asociaci\u00f3n PFCP al punto final N4/PFCP del UPF puede explotar este problema para bloquear repetidamente el UPF y perturbar los servicios del plano de usuario."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-65564",
"lastModified": "2026-10-13T11:10:00.203",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-65564",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-19T17:31:05.395142Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-12-18T19:16:33.963",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/omec-project/upf/issues/956"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/omec-project/upf/pull/964"
},
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/omec-project/upf/issues/956"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-476"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.