FKIE_CVE-2025-6432

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-06-24 13:15 - Updated: 2026-04-13 15:17
Severity ?
8.6 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Summary
When Multi-Account Containers was enabled, DNS requests could have bypassed a SOCKS proxy when the domain name was invalid or the SOCKS proxy was not responding. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 140 and Thunderbird 140.
References
security@mozilla.orghttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1943804Permissions Required
security@mozilla.orghttps://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2025-51/Vendor Advisory
security@mozilla.orghttps://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2025-54/
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
mozilla firefox *
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:firefox:*:*:*:*:-:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "77D2BF2A-26A3-4664-93B5-B41BCF17AC9E",
              "versionEndExcluding": "140.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "When Multi-Account Containers was enabled, DNS requests could have bypassed a SOCKS proxy when the domain name was invalid or the SOCKS proxy was not responding. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 140 and Thunderbird 140."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Al habilitar los Contenedores Multicuenta, las solicitudes DNS pod\u00edan eludir un proxy SOCKS cuando el nombre de dominio no era v\u00e1lido o el proxy SOCKS no respond\u00eda. Esta vulnerabilidad afecta a Firefox anterior a la versi\u00f3n 140."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-6432",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-13T15:17:07.637",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 8.6,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 4.7,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-06-24T13:15:24.220",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@mozilla.org",
      "tags": [
        "Permissions Required"
      ],
      "url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1943804"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@mozilla.org",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2025-51/"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@mozilla.org",
      "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2025-54/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@mozilla.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-200"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.