FKIE_CVE-2025-58631

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-09-03 15:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 09:44
Severity
5.9 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Summary
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in ZEEN101 IssueM issuem allows DOM-Based XSS.This issue affects IssueM: from n/a through <= 2.9.0.
References
audit@patchstack.comhttps://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/issuem/vulnerability/wordpress-issuem-plugin-2-9-0-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://wordpress.org/plugins",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "issuem",
          "product": "IssueM",
          "vendor": "ZEEN101",
          "versions": [
            {
              "changes": [
                {
                  "at": "2.9.1",
                  "status": "unaffected"
                }
              ],
              "lessThanOrEqual": "2.9.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027) vulnerability in ZEEN101 IssueM issuem allows DOM-Based XSS.This issue affects IssueM: from n/a through \u003c= 2.9.0."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-58631",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T09:44:39.167",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 5.9,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.7,
        "impactScore": 3.7,
        "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-58631",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-09-03T17:35:56.872297Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-09-03T15:15:46.197",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/issuem/vulnerability/wordpress-issuem-plugin-2-9-0-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "audit@patchstack.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-79"
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.