FKIE_CVE-2025-53641

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-07-11 18:15 - Updated: 2025-07-15 13:14
Severity ?
8.2 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Summary
Postiz is an AI social media scheduling tool. From 1.45.1 to 1.62.3, the Postiz frontend application allows an attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP headers into the middleware pipeline. This flaw enables a server-side request forgery (SSRF) condition, which can be exploited to initiate unauthorized outbound requests from the server hosting the Postiz application. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.62.3.
References
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/commit/65eca0e2f22155b43c78724ca43617ee52e42753
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/security/advisories/GHSA-48c8-25jq-m55f
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Postiz is an AI social media scheduling tool. From 1.45.1 to 1.62.3, the Postiz frontend application allows an attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP headers into the middleware pipeline. This flaw enables a server-side request forgery (SSRF) condition, which can be exploited to initiate unauthorized outbound requests from the server hosting the Postiz application. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.62.3."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Postiz es una herramienta de programaci\u00f3n de redes sociales con IA. Desde la versi\u00f3n 1.45.1 hasta la 1.62.3, la aplicaci\u00f3n frontend de Postiz permite a un atacante inyectar encabezados HTTP arbitrarios en la canalizaci\u00f3n del middleware. Esta falla habilita una condici\u00f3n de Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), que puede explotarse para iniciar solicitudes salientes no autorizadas desde el servidor que aloja la aplicaci\u00f3n Postiz. Esta vulnerabilidad se corrigi\u00f3 en la versi\u00f3n 1.62.3."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-53641",
  "lastModified": "2025-07-15T13:14:49.980",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 8.2,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 4.2,
        "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-07-11T18:15:34.963",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/commit/65eca0e2f22155b43c78724ca43617ee52e42753"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/security/advisories/GHSA-48c8-25jq-m55f"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-918"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.