FKIE_CVE-2025-52573
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-06-26 14:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 09:36
Severity
Summary
iOS Simulator MCP Server (ios-simulator-mcp) is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for interacting with iOS simulators. Versions prior to 1.3.3 are written in a way that is vulnerable to command injection vulnerability attacks as part of some of its MCP Server tool definition and implementation. The MCP Server exposes the tool `ui_tap` which relies on Node.js child process API `exec` which is an unsafe and vulnerable API if concatenated with untrusted user input. LLM exposed user input for `duration`, `udid`, and `x` and `y` args can be replaced with shell meta-characters like `;` or `&&` or others to change the behavior from running the expected command `idb` to another command. When LLMs are tricked through prompt injection (and other techniques and attack vectors) to call the tool with input that uses special shell characters such as `; rm -rf /tmp;#` and other payload variations, the full command-line text will be interepted by the shell and result in other commands except of `ps` executing on the host running the MCP Server. Version 1.3.3 contains a patch for the issue.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "ios-simulator-mcp",
"vendor": "joshuayoes",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.3.3"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "iOS Simulator MCP Server (ios-simulator-mcp) is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for interacting with iOS simulators. Versions prior to 1.3.3 are written in a way that is vulnerable to command injection vulnerability attacks as part of some of its MCP Server tool definition and implementation. The MCP Server exposes the tool `ui_tap` which relies on Node.js child process API `exec` which is an unsafe and vulnerable API if concatenated with untrusted user input. LLM exposed user input for `duration`, `udid`, and `x` and `y` args can be replaced with shell meta-characters like `;` or `\u0026\u0026` or others to change the behavior from running the expected command `idb` to another command. When LLMs are tricked through prompt injection (and other techniques and attack vectors) to call the tool with input that uses special shell characters such as `; rm -rf /tmp;#` and other payload variations, the full command-line text will be interepted by the shell and result in other commands except of `ps` executing on the host running the MCP Server. Version 1.3.3 contains a patch for the issue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "iOS Simulator MCP Server (ios-simulator-mcp) es un servidor de protocolo de contexto de modelo (MCP) para interactuar con simuladores de iOS. Las versiones anteriores a la 1.3.3 est\u00e1n escritas de forma vulnerable a ataques de vulnerabilidad de inyecci\u00f3n de comandos como parte de la definici\u00f3n e implementaci\u00f3n de la herramienta del servidor MCP. El servidor MCP expone la herramienta `ui_tap`, que se basa en la API `exec` del proceso secundario de Node.js, que es una API insegura y vulnerable si se concatena con entradas de usuario no confiables. La entrada de usuario expuesta por LLM para los argumentos `duration`, `udid` y `x` e `y` se puede reemplazar con metacaracteres de shell como `;` o `\u0026amp;\u0026amp;` u otros para cambiar el comportamiento de ejecutar el comando esperado `idb` a otro comando. Cuando se enga\u00f1a a los LLM mediante la inyecci\u00f3n de prompt (y otras t\u00e9cnicas y vectores de ataque) para llamar a la herramienta con una entrada que usa caracteres de shell especiales como `;` rm -rf /tmp;#` y otras variaciones del payload, el texto completo de la l\u00ednea de comandos ser\u00e1 interpretado por el shell y provocar\u00e1 la ejecuci\u00f3n de otros comandos, excepto `ps`, en el host que ejecuta el servidor MCP. La versi\u00f3n 1.3.3 incluye un parche para este problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-52573",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T09:36:42.280",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.0,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 0.8,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-52573",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-06-26T17:37:44.966639Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-06-26T14:15:30.577",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/joshuayoes/ios-simulator-mcp/blob/main/src/index.ts#L166-L207"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/joshuayoes/ios-simulator-mcp/commit/eb53a4f2cc8bbeb13e8d6d930f00167befcdb809"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/joshuayoes/ios-simulator-mcp/releases/tag/v1.3.3"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/joshuayoes/ios-simulator-mcp/security/advisories/GHSA-6f6r-m9pv-67jw"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-78"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.