FKIE_CVE-2025-48574

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-02 19:16 - Updated: 2026-03-06 04:15
Summary
In validateAddingWindowLw of DisplayPolicy.java, there is a possible way for an app to intercept drag-and-drop events due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
google android 14.0
google android 15.0
google android 16.0

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:google:android:14.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "2700BCC5-634D-4EC6-AB67-5B678D5F951D",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:google:android:15.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "8538774C-906D-4B03-A3E7-FA7A55E0DA9E",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:google:android:16.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "02882AB1-7993-47DD-84A0-8DF4272D85ED",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In validateAddingWindowLw of DisplayPolicy.java, there is a possible way for an app to intercept drag-and-drop events due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En validateAddingWindowLw de DisplayPolicy.java, existe una forma posible para que una aplicaci\u00f3n intercepte eventos de arrastrar y soltar debido a una verificaci\u00f3n de permisos faltante. Esto podr\u00eda conducir a una escalada local de privilegios sin privilegios de ejecuci\u00f3n adicionales necesarios. No se necesita interacci\u00f3n del usuario para la explotaci\u00f3n."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-48574",
  "lastModified": "2026-03-06T04:15:57.143",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 8.4,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.5,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-03-02T19:16:26.093",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@android.com",
      "url": "https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/2026/2026-03-01"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@android.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-862"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…