FKIE_CVE-2025-32127

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-04-04 16:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 09:11
Summary
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in onOffice GmbH onOffice for WP-Websites onoffice-for-wp-websites allows SQL Injection.This issue affects onOffice for WP-Websites: from n/a through <= 5.7.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://wordpress.org/plugins",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "onoffice-for-wp-websites",
          "product": "onOffice for WP-Websites",
          "vendor": "onOffice GmbH",
          "versions": [
            {
              "changes": [
                {
                  "at": "6.5.1",
                  "status": "unaffected"
                }
              ],
              "lessThanOrEqual": "5.7",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027) vulnerability in onOffice GmbH onOffice for WP-Websites onoffice-for-wp-websites allows SQL Injection.This issue affects onOffice for WP-Websites: from n/a through \u003c= 5.7."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Vulnerabilidad de neutralizaci\u00f3n incorrecta de elementos especiales utilizados en un comando SQL (\u0027Inyecci\u00f3n SQL\u0027) en onOffice GmbH onOffice for WP-Websites permite la inyecci\u00f3n SQL. Este problema afecta a onOffice para WP-Websites desde la versi\u00f3n n/d hasta la 5.7."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-32127",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T09:11:29.130",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 7.6,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.3,
        "impactScore": 4.7,
        "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-32127",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-04-04T19:55:11.957530Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-04-04T16:15:20.483",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/onoffice-for-wp-websites/vulnerability/wordpress-onoffice-for-wp-websites-plugin-5-7-sql-injection-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "audit@patchstack.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-89"
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…