FKIE_CVE-2025-2568
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-04-08 12:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 09:07
Severity
Summary
The Vayu Blocks – Gutenberg Blocks for WordPress & WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access and modification of data due to missing capability checks on the 'vayu_blocks_get_toggle_switch_values_callback' and 'vayu_blocks_save_toggle_switch_callback' function in versions 1.0.4 to 1.2.1. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to read plugin options and update any option with a key name ending in '_value'.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Vayu Blocks \u2013 Gutenberg Blocks for WordPress \u0026 WooCommerce",
"vendor": "themehunk",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.2.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.4",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@wordfence.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Vayu Blocks \u2013 Gutenberg Blocks for WordPress \u0026 WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access and modification of data due to missing capability checks on the \u0027vayu_blocks_get_toggle_switch_values_callback\u0027 and \u0027vayu_blocks_save_toggle_switch_callback\u0027 function in versions 1.0.4 to 1.2.1. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to read plugin options and update any option with a key name ending in \u0027_value\u0027."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El complemento Vayu Blocks \u2013 Gutenberg Blocks for WordPress \u0026amp; WooCommerce para WordPress es vulnerable al acceso no autorizado y la modificaci\u00f3n de datos debido a la falta de comprobaciones de capacidad en las funciones \u00abvayu_blocks_get_toggle_switch_values_callback\u00bb y \u00abvayu_blocks_save_toggle_switch_callback\u00bb en las versiones 1.0.4 a 1.2.1. Esto permite que atacantes no autenticados lean las opciones del plugin y actualicen cualquier opci\u00f3n cuyo nombre de clave termine en \u00ab_value\u00bb."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-2568",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T09:07:12.047",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-2568",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-08T13:00:47.915889Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-04-08T12:15:15.760",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/vayu-blocks/trunk/inc/function.php#L126"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/vayu-blocks/trunk/inc/function.php#L133"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/vayu-blocks/trunk/inc/function.php#L139"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/vayu-blocks/trunk/inc/function.php#L182"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3263702/"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/27ca93a1-3dfc-4bbd-834a-1c04d9e22ebf?source=cve"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-862"
}
],
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…