FKIE_CVE-2025-24973
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-02-11 16:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 08:59| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "concorde",
"vendor": "nexryai",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 12.25Q1.1"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Concorde, formerly know as Nexkey, is a fork of the federated microblogging platform Misskey. Prior to version 12.25Q1.1, due to an improper implementation of the logout process, authentication credentials remain in cookies even after a user has explicitly logged out, which may allow an attacker to steal authentication tokens. This could have devastating consequences if a user with admin privileges is (or was) using a shared device. Users who have logged in on a shared device should go to Settings \u003e Security and regenerate their login tokens. Version 12.25Q1.1 fixes the issue. As a workaround, clear cookies and site data in the browser after logging out."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Concorde, anteriormente conocida como Nexkey, es una bifurcaci\u00f3n de la plataforma de microblogging federada Misskey. Antes de la versi\u00f3n 12.25Q1.1, debido a una implementaci\u00f3n incorrecta del proceso de cierre de sesi\u00f3n, las credenciales de autenticaci\u00f3n permanec\u00edan en las cookies incluso despu\u00e9s de que un usuario cerrara sesi\u00f3n expl\u00edcitamente, lo que pod\u00eda permitir a un atacante robar tokens de autenticaci\u00f3n. Esto podr\u00eda tener consecuencias devastadoras si un usuario con privilegios de administrador est\u00e1 (o estaba) usando un dispositivo compartido. Los usuarios que hayan iniciado sesi\u00f3n en un dispositivo compartido deben ir a Configuraci\u00f3n \u0026gt; Seguridad y regenerar sus tokens de inicio de sesi\u00f3n. La versi\u00f3n 12.25Q1.1 soluciona el problema. Como workaround, borre las cookies y los datos del sitio en el navegador despu\u00e9s de cerrar sesi\u00f3n. "
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-24973",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T08:59:54.557",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.5,
"impactScore": 6.0,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-24973",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-02-11T16:11:36.043904Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-02-11T16:15:52.020",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/nexryai/concorde/commit/1f6ac9b289906083b132e4f9667a31a60ef83e4e"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/nexryai/concorde/security/advisories/GHSA-2369-p2wh-7cc2"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-613"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.