FKIE_CVE-2025-24001

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-01-21 14:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 08:57
Summary
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ngô Thắng IT PPO Call To Actions ppo-call-to-actions allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects PPO Call To Actions: from n/a through <= 0.1.3.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://wordpress.org/plugins",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "ppo-call-to-actions",
          "product": "PPO Call To Actions",
          "vendor": "Ng\u00f4 Th\u1eafng IT",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "0.1.3",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ng\u00f4 Th\u1eafng IT PPO Call To Actions ppo-call-to-actions allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects PPO Call To Actions: from n/a through \u003c= 0.1.3."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Vulnerabilidad Cross-Site Request Forgery  (CSRF) en PPO Vi?t Nam (ppo.vn) PPO Call To Actions permiten Cross Site Request Forgery. Este problema afecta a las llamadas a la acci\u00f3n de PPO: desde n/a hasta 0.1.3."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-24001",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T08:57:52.020",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 7.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 3.7,
        "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-24001",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-01-21T14:21:30.100926Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-01-21T14:15:13.600",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/ppo-call-to-actions/vulnerability/wordpress-ppo-call-to-actions-plugin-0-1-3-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "audit@patchstack.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-352"
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…