FKIE_CVE-2025-21895
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-04-01 16:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 08:44
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
perf/core: Order the PMU list to fix warning about unordered pmu_ctx_list
Syskaller triggers a warning due to prev_epc->pmu != next_epc->pmu in
perf_event_swap_task_ctx_data(). vmcore shows that two lists have the same
perf_event_pmu_context, but not in the same order.
The problem is that the order of pmu_ctx_list for the parent is impacted by
the time when an event/PMU is added. While the order for a child is
impacted by the event order in the pinned_groups and flexible_groups. So
the order of pmu_ctx_list in the parent and child may be different.
To fix this problem, insert the perf_event_pmu_context to its proper place
after iteration of the pmu_ctx_list.
The follow testcase can trigger above warning:
# perf record -e cycles --call-graph lbr -- taskset -c 3 ./a.out &
# perf stat -e cpu-clock,cs -p xxx // xxx is the pid of a.out
test.c
void main() {
int count = 0;
pid_t pid;
printf("%d running\n", getpid());
sleep(30);
printf("running\n");
pid = fork();
if (pid == -1) {
printf("fork error\n");
return;
}
if (pid == 0) {
while (1) {
count++;
}
} else {
while (1) {
count++;
}
}
}
The testcase first opens an LBR event, so it will allocate task_ctx_data,
and then open tracepoint and software events, so the parent context will
have 3 different perf_event_pmu_contexts. On inheritance, child ctx will
insert the perf_event_pmu_context in another order and the warning will
trigger.
[ mingo: Tidied up the changelog. ]
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.14 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.14 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.14 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.14 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"kernel/events/core.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "f0c3971405cef6892844016aa710121a02da3a23",
"status": "affected",
"version": "bd27568117664b8b3e259721393df420ed51f57b",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7d582eb6e4e100959ba07083d7563453c8c2a343",
"status": "affected",
"version": "bd27568117664b8b3e259721393df420ed51f57b",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3e812a70732d84b7873cea61a7f6349b9a9dcbf5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "bd27568117664b8b3e259721393df420ed51f57b",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "2016066c66192a99d9e0ebf433789c490a6785a2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "bd27568117664b8b3e259721393df420ed51f57b",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"kernel/events/core.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.2"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.2",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.81",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.18",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.13.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.13.6",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.14",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8C92C9CD-2ADE-412E-A7FF-DC9E0630B25D",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.81",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "3D5C8D9A-4013-4C1A-810F-AA540BB5737C",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.18",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "64F12D9B-71C2-4CD7-A288-0D5EF1709620",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.13.6",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "186716B6-2B66-4BD0-852E-D48E71C0C85F",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0D3E781C-403A-498F-9DA9-ECEE50F41E75",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "66619FB8-0AAF-4166-B2CF-67B24143261D",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "D3D6550E-6679-4560-902D-AF52DCFE905B",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nperf/core: Order the PMU list to fix warning about unordered pmu_ctx_list\n\nSyskaller triggers a warning due to prev_epc-\u003epmu != next_epc-\u003epmu in\nperf_event_swap_task_ctx_data(). vmcore shows that two lists have the same\nperf_event_pmu_context, but not in the same order.\n\nThe problem is that the order of pmu_ctx_list for the parent is impacted by\nthe time when an event/PMU is added. While the order for a child is\nimpacted by the event order in the pinned_groups and flexible_groups. So\nthe order of pmu_ctx_list in the parent and child may be different.\n\nTo fix this problem, insert the perf_event_pmu_context to its proper place\nafter iteration of the pmu_ctx_list.\n\nThe follow testcase can trigger above warning:\n\n # perf record -e cycles --call-graph lbr -- taskset -c 3 ./a.out \u0026\n # perf stat -e cpu-clock,cs -p xxx // xxx is the pid of a.out\n\n test.c\n\n void main() {\n int count = 0;\n pid_t pid;\n\n printf(\"%d running\\n\", getpid());\n sleep(30);\n printf(\"running\\n\");\n\n pid = fork();\n if (pid == -1) {\n printf(\"fork error\\n\");\n return;\n }\n if (pid == 0) {\n while (1) {\n count++;\n }\n } else {\n while (1) {\n count++;\n }\n }\n }\n\nThe testcase first opens an LBR event, so it will allocate task_ctx_data,\nand then open tracepoint and software events, so the parent context will\nhave 3 different perf_event_pmu_contexts. On inheritance, child ctx will\ninsert the perf_event_pmu_context in another order and the warning will\ntrigger.\n\n[ mingo: Tidied up the changelog. ]"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: perf/core: Ordenar la lista de PMU para corregir la advertencia sobre pmu_ctx_list desordenada Syskaller activa una advertencia debido a prev_epc-\u0026gt;pmu != next_epc-\u0026gt;pmu en perf_event_swap_task_ctx_data(). vmcore muestra que dos listas tienen el mismo perf_event_pmu_context, pero no en el mismo orden. El problema es que el orden de pmu_ctx_list para el padre se ve afectado por el momento en que se agrega un evento/PMU. Mientras que el orden para un hijo se ve afectado por el orden de los eventos en pinned_groups y flexible_groups. Por lo tanto, el orden de pmu_ctx_list en el padre y el hijo puede ser diferente. Para corregir este problema, inserte perf_event_pmu_context en su lugar correcto despu\u00e9s de la iteraci\u00f3n de pmu_ctx_list. El siguiente caso de prueba puede activar la advertencia anterior: # perf record -e cycles --call-graph lbr -- tasket -c 3 ./a.out \u0026amp; # perf stat -e cpu-clock,cs -p xxx // xxx es el pid de a.out test.c void main() { int count = 0; pid_t pid; printf(\"%d en ejecuci\u00f3n\\n\", getpid()); sleep(30); printf(\"en ejecuci\u00f3n\\n\"); pid = fork(); if (pid == -1) { printf(\"fork error\\n\"); return; } if (pid == 0) { while (1) { count++; } } else { while (1) { count++; } } } El caso de prueba primero abre un evento LBR, por lo que asignar\u00e1 task_ctx_data y luego abrir\u00e1 los eventos de tracepoint y software, por lo que el contexto principal tendr\u00e1 3 perf_event_pmu_contexts diferentes. En caso de herencia, el ctx secundario insertar\u00e1 perf_event_pmu_context en otro orden y se activar\u00e1 la advertencia. [mingo: Se orden\u00f3 el registro de cambios.]"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-21895",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T08:44:33.203",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 4.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.0,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-04-01T16:15:19.883",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2016066c66192a99d9e0ebf433789c490a6785a2"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3e812a70732d84b7873cea61a7f6349b9a9dcbf5"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7d582eb6e4e100959ba07083d7563453c8c2a343"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f0c3971405cef6892844016aa710121a02da3a23"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-362"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.