FKIE_CVE-2025-14986

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-12-30 21:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 08:36
Summary
When frontend.enableExecuteMultiOperation is enabled, the server can apply namespace-scoped validation and feature gates for the embedded StartWorkflowExecutionRequest using its Namespace field rather than the outer, authorized ExecuteMultiOperationRequest.Namespace. This allows a caller authorized for one namespace to bypass that namespace's limits/policies by setting the embedded start request's namespace to a different namespace. The workflow is still created in the outer (authorized) namespace; only validation/gating is performed under the wrong namespace context. This issue affects Temporal: from 1.24.0 through 1.29.1. Fixed in 1.27.4, 1.28.2, 1.29.2.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://github.com/temporalio/temporal",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "temporal",
          "product": "Temporal",
          "repo": "https://github.com/temporalio/temporal",
          "vendor": "Temporal",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "1.29.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.24.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "1.28.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.24.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "1.27.3",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.24.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@temporal.io"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "When frontend.enableExecuteMultiOperation is enabled, the server can apply namespace-scoped validation and feature gates for the embedded StartWorkflowExecutionRequest using its Namespace field rather than the outer, authorized ExecuteMultiOperationRequest.Namespace. This allows a caller authorized for one namespace to bypass that namespace\u0027s limits/policies by setting the embedded start request\u0027s namespace to a different namespace. The workflow is still created in the outer (authorized) namespace; only validation/gating is performed under the wrong namespace context.\nThis issue affects Temporal: from 1.24.0 through 1.29.1. Fixed in 1.27.4, 1.28.2, 1.29.2."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Cuando frontend.enableExecuteMultiOperation est\u00e1 habilitado, el servidor puede aplicar validaci\u00f3n con \u00e1mbito de espacio de nombres y puertas de caracter\u00edsticas para la StartWorkflowExecutionRequest incrustada usando su campo Namespace en lugar del Namespace de la ExecuteMultiOperationRequest externa y autorizada. Esto permite a un llamador autorizado para un espacio de nombres eludir los l\u00edmites/pol\u00edticas de ese espacio de nombres al establecer el espacio de nombres de la solicitud de inicio incrustada a un espacio de nombres diferente. El flujo de trabajo a\u00fan se crea en el espacio de nombres externo (autorizado); solo la validaci\u00f3n/aplicaci\u00f3n de puertas se realiza bajo el contexto de espacio de nombres incorrecto.\nEste problema afecta a Temporal: desde 1.24.0 hasta 1.29.1. Corregido en 1.27.4, 1.28.2, 1.29.2."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-14986",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T08:36:53.560",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV40": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "Automatable": "YES",
          "Recovery": "USER",
          "Safety": "NEGLIGIBLE",
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackRequirements": "NONE",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "baseScore": 1.3,
          "baseSeverity": "LOW",
          "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "exploitMaturity": "UNREPORTED",
          "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "providerUrgency": "GREEN",
          "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:X/RE:L/U:Green",
          "version": "4.0",
          "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
          "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "LOW"
        },
        "source": "security@temporal.io",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-14986",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-01-02T15:30:54.551721Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-12-30T21:15:42.773",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@temporal.io",
      "url": "https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/releases/tag/v1.27.4"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@temporal.io",
      "url": "https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/releases/tag/v1.28.2"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@temporal.io",
      "url": "https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/releases/tag/v1.29.2"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@temporal.io",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-863"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@temporal.io",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.