FKIE_CVE-2025-14074

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-12-12 10:15 - Updated: 2026-10-07 20:10
Summary
The PDF for Contact Form 7 + Drag and Drop Template Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized post duplication due to a missing capability check on the 'rednumber_duplicate' function in all versions up to, and including, 6.3.3. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to duplicate arbitrary posts, including password protected or private ones.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "PDF for Contact Form 7 + Drag and Drop Template Builder",
          "vendor": "addonsorg",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.3.3",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The PDF for Contact Form 7 + Drag and Drop Template Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized post duplication due to a missing capability check on the \u0027rednumber_duplicate\u0027 function in all versions up to, and including, 6.3.3. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to duplicate arbitrary posts, including password protected or private ones."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El plugin PDF for Contact Form 7 + Drag and Drop Template Builder para WordPress es vulnerable a la duplicaci\u00f3n no autorizada de entradas debido a una comprobaci\u00f3n de capacidad faltante en la funci\u00f3n \u0027rednumber_duplicate\u0027 en todas las versiones hasta la 6.3.3, inclusive. Esto hace posible que atacantes autenticados, con acceso de nivel Suscriptor y superior, dupliquen entradas arbitrarias, incluyendo las protegidas con contrase\u00f1a o privadas."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-14074",
  "lastModified": "2026-10-07T20:10:01.970",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-14074",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-12-12T20:47:44.815465Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-12-12T10:15:48.703",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/pdf-for-contact-form-7/tags/6.3.2/backend/index.php#L697"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/pdf-for-contact-form-7/trunk/backend/index.php#L697"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3416014%40pdf-for-contact-form-7\u0026new=3416014%40pdf-for-contact-form-7\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/0d00b50c-949a-4fd0-9eab-3555d263fcc7?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-862"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.