FKIE_CVE-2025-13426

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-12-05 22:15 - Updated: 2026-09-25 23:10
Summary
A vulnerability exists in Google Apigee's JavaCallout policy https://docs.apigee.com/api-platform/reference/policies/java-callout-policy that allows for remote code execution. It is possible for a user to write a JavaCallout that injected a malicious object into the MessageContext to execute arbitrary Java code and system commands at runtime, leading to unauthorized access to data, lateral movement within the network, and access to backend systems. The Apigee hybrid versions below have all been updated to protect from this vulnerability: * Hybrid_1.11.2+ * Hybrid_1.12.4+ * Hybrid_1.13.3+ * Hybrid_1.14.1+ * OPDK_5202+ * OPDK_5300+
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Apigee hybrid Javacallout policy",
          "vendor": "Google Cloud",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "Hybrid_1.11.2",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "Hybrid_1.12.4",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "Hybrid_1.13.3",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "Hybrid_1.14.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "OPDK_5202",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "OPDK_5300",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A vulnerability exists in Google  Apigee\u0027s JavaCallout policy https://docs.apigee.com/api-platform/reference/policies/java-callout-policy  that allows for remote code execution.\n\nIt is possible for a user to write a JavaCallout that injected a malicious object into the MessageContext to execute arbitrary Java code and system commands at runtime,\u00a0leading to unauthorized access to data, lateral movement within the network, and access to backend systems.\n\nThe Apigee hybrid versions below have all been updated to protect from this vulnerability:\n  *  Hybrid_1.11.2+\n  *  Hybrid_1.12.4+\n  *  Hybrid_1.13.3+\n  *  Hybrid_1.14.1+\n  *  OPDK_5202+\n  *  OPDK_5300+"
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Existe una vulnerabilidad en la pol\u00edtica JavaCallout de Google Apigee https://docs.apigee.com/api-platform/reference/policies/java-callout-policy que permite la ejecuci\u00f3n remota de c\u00f3digo.\n\nEs posible que un usuario escriba un JavaCallout que inyecte un objeto malicioso en el MessageContext para ejecutar c\u00f3digo Java arbitrario y comandos del sistema en tiempo de ejecuci\u00f3n, lo que lleva a un acceso no autorizado a los datos, movimiento lateral dentro de la red y acceso a sistemas de backend.\n\nLas versiones h\u00edbridas de Apigee a continuaci\u00f3n han sido todas actualizadas para protegerse de esta vulnerabilidad:\n  * Hybrid_1.11.2+\n  * Hybrid_1.12.4+\n  * Hybrid_1.13.3+\n  * Hybrid_1.14.1+\n  * OPDK_5202+\n  * OPDK_5300+"
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-13426",
  "lastModified": "2026-09-25T23:10:00.463",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV40": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackRequirements": "NONE",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "baseScore": 8.7,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "providerUrgency": "CLEAR",
          "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Clear",
          "version": "4.0",
          "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
        },
        "source": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-13426",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-12-08T17:27:37.360144Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-12-05T22:15:47.793",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
      "url": "https://docs.cloud.google.com/apigee/docs/hybrid/release-notes#March_01_2025"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-913"
        }
      ],
      "source": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.