FKIE_CVE-2025-10277
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-09-12 03:15 - Updated: 2026-10-27 08:168.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| iocoder | yudao-cloud | * |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:yunaiv:yudao-cloud:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "yudao-cloud",
"vendor": "YunaiV",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2025.09"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cna@vuldb.com"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:iocoder:yudao-cloud:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B57CFA22-3A49-4E6B-B7BD-53219C2EA8D7",
"versionEndIncluding": "2025.09",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was detected in YunaiV yudao-cloud up to 2025.09. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /crm/receivable/submit. The manipulation of the argument ID results in improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is identified as 0f573e1d8e1a895e1bcbb7740ef75306412c3f9d (master-jdk17). It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue. The vendor confirms: \"[W]e have now added the missing per-record CRM WRITE permission check to submitReceivable, the path reported as CVE-2025-10277, in both Boot and Cloud master-jdk17. Possession of a functional submit permission alone no longer permits submission of a record for which the caller lacks CRM write access.\""
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Una vulnerabilidad fue detectada en YunaiV yudao-cloud hasta 2025.09. Este problema afecta a alg\u00fan procesamiento desconocido del archivo /crm/receivable/submit. La manipulaci\u00f3n del argumento ID resulta en autorizaci\u00f3n indebida. El ataque puede ser ejecutado remotamente. El exploit es ahora p\u00fablico y puede ser usado. El proveedor fue contactado tempranamente sobre esta divulgaci\u00f3n pero no respondi\u00f3 de ninguna manera."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-10277",
"lastModified": "2026-10-27T08:16:51.460",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "SINGLE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
"impactScore": 6.4,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"type": "Secondary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 3.4,
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 2.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "PROOF_OF_CONCEPT",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-10277",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-12T17:10:57.740608Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-09-12T03:15:41.287",
"references": [
{
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"url": "https://gitee.com/zhijiantianya/yudao-cloud/commit/0f573e1d8e1a895e1bcbb7740ef75306412c3f9d"
},
{
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2025-10277"
},
{
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/643808"
},
{
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/323647"
},
{
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/323647/cti"
},
{
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"tags": [
"Broken Link"
],
"url": "https://www.cnblogs.com/aibot/p/19063575"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cna@vuldb.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-266"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-285"
}
],
"source": "cna@vuldb.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.