FKIE_CVE-2024-51737
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-01-08 16:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 08:06| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "RediSearch",
"vendor": "RediSearch",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 2.0.0, \u003c 2.6.24"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 2.8.0, \u003c 2.8.21"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 2.10.0, \u003c 2.10.10"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RediSearch is a Redis module that provides querying, secondary indexing, and full-text search for Redis. An authenticated redis user executing FT.SEARCH or FT.AGGREGATE with a specially crafted LIMIT command argument, or FT.SEARCH with a specially crafted KNN command argument, can trigger an integer overflow, leading to heap overflow and potential remote code execution. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.6.24, 2.8.21, and 2.10.10. Avoid setting value of -1 or large values for configuration parameters MAXSEARCHRESULTS and MAXAGGREGATERESULTS, to avoid exploiting large LIMIT arguments."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "RediSearch es un m\u00f3dulo de Redis que proporciona consultas, indexaci\u00f3n secundaria y b\u00fasqueda de texto completo para Redis. Un usuario de Redis autenticado que ejecuta FT.SEARCH o FT.AGGREGATE con un argumento de comando LIMIT especialmente manipulado, o FT.SEARCH con un argumento de comando KNN especialmente manipulado, puede provocar un desbordamiento de enteros, lo que lleva a un desbordamiento de mont\u00f3n y una posible ejecuci\u00f3n remota de c\u00f3digo. Esta vulnerabilidad se solucion\u00f3 en 2.6.24, 2.8.21 y 2.10.10. Evite establecer un valor de -1 o valores grandes para los par\u00e1metros de configuraci\u00f3n MAXSEARCHRESULTS y MAXAGGREGATERESULTS, para evitar explotar argumentos LIMIT grandes."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-51737",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T08:06:13.420",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.0,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.0,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-51737",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-01-08T15:43:06.304548Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-01-08T16:15:35.170",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/RediSearch/RediSearch/commit/13a2936d921dbe5a2e3c72653e0bd7b26af3a6cb"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/RediSearch/RediSearch/security/advisories/GHSA-p2pg-67m3-4c76"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-122"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-190"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.