FKIE_CVE-2024-5165
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-05-23 10:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 08:155.4 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Eclipse Ditto",
"vendor": "Eclipse Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.4.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.5.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "emo@eclipse.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:ditto:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6F6F2718-0B15-4655-B194-48D978E66BFA",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.5.6",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In Eclipse Ditto versions 3.0.0 to 3.5.5, the user input of several input fields of the Eclipse Ditto Explorer User Interface https://eclipse.dev/ditto/user-interface.html was not properly neutralized and thus vulnerable to both Reflected and Stored XSS (Cross Site Scripting).\n\n\n\n\n\nSeveral inputs were not persisted at the backend of Eclipse Ditto, but only in local browser storage to save settings of \"environments\" of the UI and e.g. the last performed \"search queries\", resulting in a \"Reflected XSS\" vulnerability.\n\n\n\n\nHowever, several other inputs were persisted at the backend of Eclipse Ditto, leading to a \"Stored XSS\" vulnerability. Those mean that authenticated and authorized users at Eclipse Ditto can persist Things in Ditto which can - when being displayed by other users also being authorized to see those Things in the Eclipse Ditto UI - cause scripts to be executed in the browser of other users."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En las versiones 3.0.0 a 3.5.5 de Eclipse Ditto, la entrada del usuario de varios campos de entrada de la interfaz de usuario de Eclipse Ditto Explorer https://eclipse.dev/ditto/user-interface.html no se neutraliz\u00f3 adecuadamente y, por lo tanto, fue vulnerable a ambos. XSS reflejado y almacenado (Cross Site Scripting). Varias entradas no persistieron en el backend de Eclipse Ditto, sino solo en el almacenamiento del navegador local para guardar la configuraci\u00f3n de los \"entornos\" de la interfaz de usuario y, por ejemplo, las \u00faltimas \"consultas de b\u00fasqueda\" realizadas, lo que result\u00f3 en una vulnerabilidad \"XSS reflejada\". Sin embargo, varias otras entradas persistieron en el backend de Eclipse Ditto, lo que provoc\u00f3 una vulnerabilidad \"Stored XSS\". Esto significa que los usuarios autenticados y autorizados en Eclipse Ditto pueden conservar cosas en Ditto que pueden, cuando son mostradas por otros usuarios que tambi\u00e9n est\u00e1n autorizados a ver esas cosas en la interfaz de usuario de Eclipse Ditto, provocar que se ejecuten scripts en el navegador de otros usuarios."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-5165",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T08:15:19.747",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.3,
"impactScore": 2.7,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-5165",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-05-23T19:50:06.370667Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-05-23T10:15:10.183",
"references": [
{
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignement/-/issues/23"
},
{
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/issues/201"
},
{
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/issues/202"
},
{
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/issues/204"
},
{
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/issues/207"
},
{
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/issues/209"
},
{
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/issues/210"
},
{
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/issues/211"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignement/-/issues/23"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/issues/201"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/issues/202"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/issues/204"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/issues/207"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/issues/209"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/issues/210"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/issues/211"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "emo@eclipse.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-79"
}
],
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-79"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.