FKIE_CVE-2024-45295

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-09-06 17:15 - Updated: 2024-09-06 17:15
Severity ?
Summary
Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2024-45294. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2024-45294. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-45294 instead of this candidate. This CVE was issued to a vulnerability that is dependent on CVE-2024-45294. According to rule 4.2.15 of the CVE CNA rules, "CNAs MUST NOT assign a different CVE ID to a Vulnerability that is fully interdependent with another Vulnerability. The Vulnerabilities are effectively the same single Vulnerability and MUST use one CVE ID."
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2024-45294. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2024-45294. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-45294 instead of this candidate. This CVE was issued to a vulnerability that is dependent on CVE-2024-45294. According to rule 4.2.15 of the CVE CNA rules, \"CNAs MUST NOT assign a different CVE ID to a Vulnerability that is fully interdependent with another Vulnerability. The Vulnerabilities are effectively the same single Vulnerability and MUST use one CVE ID.\""
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-45295",
  "lastModified": "2024-09-06T17:15:17.053",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2024-09-06T17:15:17.053",
  "references": [],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Rejected"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…