FKIE_CVE-2024-25139

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-03-14 16:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 07:15
Summary
In TP-Link Omada er605 1.0.1 through (v2.6) 2.2.3, a cloud-brd binary is susceptible to an integer overflow that leads to a heap-based buffer overflow. After heap shaping, an attacker can achieve code execution in the context of the cloud-brd binary that runs at the root level. This is fixed in ER605(UN)_v2_2.2.4 Build 020240119.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
tp-link omada_er605_firmware *
tp-link omada_er605 2.6

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    },
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:tp-link:omada_er605:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "omada_er605",
          "vendor": "tp-link",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.2.4",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:tp-link:omada_er605_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "D40F421A-934D-41FA-B663-D1310A7847C7",
              "versionEndIncluding": "2.2.3",
              "versionStartIncluding": "1.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        },
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:tp-link:omada_er605:2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "28A4EAC7-4D17-4837-8459-3A54F805BD0D",
              "vulnerable": false
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ],
      "operator": "AND"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In TP-Link Omada er605 1.0.1 through (v2.6) 2.2.3, a cloud-brd binary is susceptible to an integer overflow that leads to a heap-based buffer overflow. After heap shaping, an attacker can achieve code execution in the context of the cloud-brd binary that runs at the root level. This is fixed in ER605(UN)_v2_2.2.4 Build 020240119."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En TP-Link Omada er605 1.0.1 a (v2.6) 2.2.3, un binario cloud-brd es susceptible a un desbordamiento de almacenamiento din\u00e1mico que conduce a un desbordamiento del b\u00fafer de almacenamiento din\u00e1mico. Despu\u00e9s de la configuraci\u00f3n del mont\u00f3n, un atacante puede lograr la ejecuci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo en el contexto del binario cloud-brd que se ejecuta en el nivel ra\u00edz. Esto se solucion\u00f3 en ER605(UN)_v2_2.2.4 Build 020240119."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-25139",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T07:15:34.860",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 10.0,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 6.0,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2024-25139",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2024-03-15T15:30:59.328136Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-03-14T16:15:50.077",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/microsoft/Microsoft-TP-Link-Research-Team"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Product"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.tp-link.com/us/omada-sdn/"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/microsoft/Microsoft-TP-Link-Research-Team"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Product"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.tp-link.com/us/omada-sdn/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-120"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…