FKIE_CVE-2023-54303
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-12-30 13:16 - Updated: 2026-08-04 11:16| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3654ed5daf492463c3faa434c7000d45c2da2ace",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8c7dcb84e3b744b2b70baa7a44a9b1881c33a9c9",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a0ac32cf61e5a76e2429e486925a52ee41dd75e3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8c7dcb84e3b744b2b70baa7a44a9b1881c33a9c9",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f2c67a3e60d1071b65848efaa8c3b66c363dd025",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8c7dcb84e3b744b2b70baa7a44a9b1881c33a9c9",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.0",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.45",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.4.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Disable preemption in bpf_perf_event_output\n\nThe nesting protection in bpf_perf_event_output relies on disabled\npreemption, which is guaranteed for kprobes and tracepoints.\n\nHowever bpf_perf_event_output can be also called from uprobes context\nthrough bpf_prog_run_array_sleepable function which disables migration,\nbut keeps preemption enabled.\n\nThis can cause task to be preempted by another one inside the nesting\nprotection and lead eventually to two tasks using same perf_sample_data\nbuffer and cause crashes like:\n\n kernel tried to execute NX-protected page - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)\n BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff82be3eea\n ...\n Call Trace:\n ? __die+0x1f/0x70\n ? page_fault_oops+0x176/0x4d0\n ? exc_page_fault+0x132/0x230\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n ? perf_output_sample+0x12b/0x910\n ? perf_event_output+0xd0/0x1d0\n ? bpf_perf_event_output+0x162/0x1d0\n ? bpf_prog_c6271286d9a4c938_krava1+0x76/0x87\n ? __uprobe_perf_func+0x12b/0x540\n ? uprobe_dispatcher+0x2c4/0x430\n ? uprobe_notify_resume+0x2da/0xce0\n ? atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x7b/0x110\n ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x13e/0x290\n ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x5/0x30\n ? asm_exc_int3+0x35/0x40\n\nFixing this by disabling preemption in bpf_perf_event_output."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, la siguiente vulnerabilidad ha sido resuelta:\n\nbpf: Deshabilitar la preferencia en bpf_perf_event_output\n\nLa protecci\u00f3n de anidamiento en bpf_perf_event_output se basa en la preferencia deshabilitada, lo cual est\u00e1 garantizado para kprobes y tracepoints.\n\nSin embargo, bpf_perf_event_output tambi\u00e9n puede ser llamado desde el contexto de uprobes a trav\u00e9s de la funci\u00f3n bpf_prog_run_array_sleepable que deshabilita la migraci\u00f3n, pero mantiene la preferencia habilitada.\n\nEsto puede causar que una tarea sea preferida por otra dentro de la protecci\u00f3n de anidamiento y eventualmente llevar a que dos tareas usen el mismo b\u00fafer perf_sample_data y causen fallos como:\n\n el kernel intent\u00f3 ejecutar una p\u00e1gina protegida por NX - \u00bfintento de exploit? (uid: 0)\n BUG: no se puede manejar el fallo de p\u00e1gina para la direcci\u00f3n: ffffffff82be3eea\n ...\n Rastro de Llamada:\n ? __die+0x1f/0x70\n ? page_fault_oops+0x176/0x4d0\n ? exc_page_fault+0x132/0x230\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n ? perf_output_sample+0x12b/0x910\n ? perf_event_output+0xd0/0x1d0\n ? bpf_perf_event_output+0x162/0x1d0\n ? bpf_prog_c6271286d9a4c938_krava1+0x76/0x87\n ? __uprobe_perf_func+0x12b/0x540\n ? uprobe_dispatcher+0x2c4/0x430\n ? uprobe_notify_resume+0x2da/0xce0\n ? atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x7b/0x110\n ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x13e/0x290\n ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x5/0x30\n ? asm_exc_int3+0x35/0x40\n\nEsto se soluciona deshabilitando la preferencia en bpf_perf_event_output."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-54303",
"lastModified": "2026-08-04T11:16:39.610",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-12-30T13:16:19.437",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3654ed5daf492463c3faa434c7000d45c2da2ace"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a0ac32cf61e5a76e2429e486925a52ee41dd75e3"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2c67a3e60d1071b65848efaa8c3b66c363dd025"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.