FKIE_CVE-2023-49566

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-07-15 08:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 06:36
Severity
8.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
8.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
In Apache Linkis <=1.5.0, due to the lack of effective filtering of parameters, an attacker configuring malicious db2 parameters in the DataSource Manager Module will result in jndi injection. Therefore, the parameters in the DB2 URL should be blacklisted.  This attack requires the attacker to obtain an authorized account from Linkis before it can be carried out. Versions of Apache Linkis <=1.5.0 will be affected. We recommend users upgrade the version of Linkis to version 1.6.0.
References
security@apache.orghttps://lists.apache.org/thread/t68yy52lmv7pxgrxnq6rw7rwvk9tb1xjMailing List, Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/13/5
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://lists.apache.org/thread/t68yy52lmv7pxgrxnq6rw7rwvk9tb1xjMailing List, Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
apache linkis *
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "org.apache.linkis:linkis-metadata-query-service-jdbc",
          "product": "Apache Linkis DataSource",
          "vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "1.6.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "*",
              "versionType": "maven"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@apache.org"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:linkis:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "5F9BA8E6-F548-4333-989B-33F7B4362998",
              "versionEndExcluding": "1.6.0",
              "versionStartIncluding": "1.4.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "\nIn Apache Linkis \u003c=1.5.0, due to the lack of effective filtering\nof parameters, an attacker configuring malicious \n\ndb2\n\n parameters in the DataSource Manager Module will result\u00a0in jndi injection. Therefore, the parameters in the DB2 URL should be blacklisted.\u00a0\n\nThis attack requires the attacker to obtain an authorized account from Linkis before it can be carried out.\n\n Versions of Apache Linkis \n\n\u003c=1.5.0\n\n will be affected.\nWe recommend users upgrade the version of Linkis to version 1.6.0.\n"
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En Apache Linkis \u0026lt;= 1.5.0, debido a la falta de un filtrado efectivo de par\u00e1metros, un atacante que configure par\u00e1metros db2 maliciosos en el m\u00f3dulo DataSource Manager resultar\u00e1 en una inyecci\u00f3n de jndi. Por lo tanto, los par\u00e1metros en la URL de DB2 deben estar en la lista negra. Este ataque requiere que el atacante obtenga una cuenta autorizada de Linkis antes de poder llevarse a cabo. Las versiones de Apache Linkis \u0026lt;=1.5.0 se ver\u00e1n afectadas. Recomendamos a los usuarios actualizar la versi\u00f3n de Linkis a la versi\u00f3n 1.6.0."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2023-49566",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T06:36:10.097",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 8.8,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      },
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 8.8,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2023-49566",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2024-07-15T13:14:11.032196Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-07-15T08:15:02.367",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/t68yy52lmv7pxgrxnq6rw7rwvk9tb1xj"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/13/5"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/t68yy52lmv7pxgrxnq6rw7rwvk9tb1xj"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-502"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.