FKIE_CVE-2023-46049
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-03-27 06:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 06:29
Severity
Summary
LLVM 15.0.0 has a NULL pointer dereference in the parseOneMetadata() function via a crafted pdflatex.fmt file (or perhaps a crafted .o file) to llvm-lto. NOTE: this is disputed because the relationship between pdflatex.fmt and any LLVM language front end is not explained, and because a crash of the llvm-lto application should be categorized as a usability problem.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cve@mitre.org"
}
],
"cveTags": [
{
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"disputed"
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "LLVM 15.0.0 has a NULL pointer dereference in the parseOneMetadata() function via a crafted pdflatex.fmt file (or perhaps a crafted .o file) to llvm-lto. NOTE: this is disputed because the relationship between pdflatex.fmt and any LLVM language front end is not explained, and because a crash of the llvm-lto application should be categorized as a usability problem."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "LLVM 15.0.0 tiene una desreferencia de puntero NULL en la funci\u00f3n parseOneMetadata() a trav\u00e9s de un archivo pdflatex.fmt modificado (o quiz\u00e1s un archivo .o modificado) a llvm-lto. NOTA: esto est\u00e1 en disputa porque no se explica la relaci\u00f3n entre pdflatex.fmt y cualquier interfaz de lenguaje LLVM, y porque una falla de la aplicaci\u00f3n llvm-lto debe clasificarse como un problema de usabilidad."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-46049",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T06:29:56.563",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2023-46049",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-07-10T15:47:36.217196Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-03-27T06:15:10.037",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Jan/66"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/67388"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://llvm.org/docs/Security.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/176820/llvm-LLVM-15-Null-Pointer.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Jan/66"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/67388"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://llvm.org/docs/Security.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-476"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…