FKIE_CVE-2023-36325

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-10-09 06:15 - Updated: 2026-04-15 00:35
Severity
3.7 (Low) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Summary
i2p before 2.3.0 (Java) allows de-anonymizing the public IPv4 and IPv6 addresses of i2p hidden services (aka eepsites) via a correlation attack across the IPv4 and IPv6 addresses that occurs when a tunneled, replayed message has a behavior discrepancy (it may be dropped, or may result in a Wrong Destination response). An attack would take days to complete.
References
cve@mitre.orghttps://geti2p.net/en/blog/post/2023/06/25/new_release_2.3.0
cve@mitre.orghttps://i2pgit.org/i2p-hackers/i2p.i2p/-/commit/82aa4e19fbb37ca1bd752ec1b836120beec0985f
cve@mitre.orghttps://xeiaso.net/blog/CVE-2023-36325
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "i2p before 2.3.0 (Java) allows de-anonymizing the public IPv4 and IPv6 addresses of i2p hidden services (aka eepsites) via a correlation attack across the IPv4 and IPv6 addresses that occurs when a tunneled, replayed message has a behavior discrepancy (it may be dropped, or may result in a Wrong Destination response). An attack would take days to complete."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "i2p anterior a la versi\u00f3n 2.3.0 (Java) permite desanonimizar las direcciones IPv4 e IPv6 p\u00fablicas de los servicios ocultos de i2p (tambi\u00e9n conocidos como eepsites) mediante un ataque de correlaci\u00f3n entre las direcciones IPv4 e IPv6 que se produce cuando un mensaje tunelizado y reproducido tiene una discrepancia de comportamiento (puede descartarse o puede dar como resultado una respuesta de destino incorrecto). Un ataque tardar\u00eda d\u00edas en completarse."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2023-36325",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-15T00:35:42.020",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 3.7,
          "baseSeverity": "LOW",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-10-09T06:15:11.303",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://geti2p.net/en/blog/post/2023/06/25/new_release_2.3.0"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://i2pgit.org/i2p-hackers/i2p.i2p/-/commit/82aa4e19fbb37ca1bd752ec1b836120beec0985f"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://xeiaso.net/blog/CVE-2023-36325"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-203"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.