FKIE_CVE-2023-1514
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2023-12-19 15:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 05:287.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| hitachienergy | rtu500_scripting_interface | 1.0.1.30 | |
| hitachienergy | rtu500_scripting_interface | 1.0.2 | |
| hitachienergy | rtu500_scripting_interface | 1.1.1 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "RTU500 Scripting Interface",
"vendor": "Hitachi Energy",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.1.30"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cybersecurity@hitachienergy.com"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:rtu500_scripting_interface:1.0.1.30:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "3E327A74-D44E-4AAF-B191-C9F8A8F4FB34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:rtu500_scripting_interface:1.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C34DFD88-6B0D-4683-8D23-808C6D251D82",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:rtu500_scripting_interface:1.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "9EF5BA03-60D1-4A72-AE7A-82D3F1286446",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability exists in the component RTU500 Scripting interface. When a client connects to a server using TLS, the server presents a certificate. This certificate links a public key to the identity of the service and is signed by a Certification Authority (CA), allowing the client to validate that the remote service can be trusted\u00a0and is not malicious. If the client does not validate the parameters of the certificate, then attackers could be able to spoof the identity of the service. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using faking the identity of a RTU500 device and intercepting the messages initiated via the RTU500 Scripting interface."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Existe una vulnerabilidad en RTU500 Scripting interface. Cuando un cliente se conecta a un servidor mediante TLS, el servidor presenta un certificado. Este certificado vincula una clave p\u00fablica a la identidad del servicio y est\u00e1 firmado por Certification Authority (CA), lo que permite al cliente validar que se puede confiar en el servicio remoto y que no es malicioso. Si el cliente no valida los par\u00e1metros del certificado, los atacantes podr\u00edan falsificar la identidad del servicio. Un atacante podr\u00eda aprovechar la vulnerabilidad falsificando la identidad de un dispositivo RTU500 e interceptando los mensajes iniciados a trav\u00e9s de RTU500 Scripting interface."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-1514",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T05:28:08.163",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "cybersecurity@hitachienergy.com",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2023-12-19T15:15:08.037",
"references": [
{
"source": "cybersecurity@hitachienergy.com",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://publisher.hitachienergy.com/preview?DocumentId=8DBD000152\u0026languageCode=en\u0026Preview=true"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://publisher.hitachienergy.com/preview?DocumentId=8DBD000152\u0026languageCode=en\u0026Preview=true"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cybersecurity@hitachienergy.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-295"
}
],
"source": "cybersecurity@hitachienergy.com",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-295"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.