FKIE_CVE-2022-49837
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-05-01 15:16 - Updated: 2026-06-17 05:19
Severity
5.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
5.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
5.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Fix memory leaks in __check_func_call
kmemleak reports this issue:
unreferenced object 0xffff88817139d000 (size 2048):
comm "test_progs", pid 33246, jiffies 4307381979 (age 45851.820s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<0000000045f075f0>] kmalloc_trace+0x27/0xa0
[<0000000098b7c90a>] __check_func_call+0x316/0x1230
[<00000000b4c3c403>] check_helper_call+0x172e/0x4700
[<00000000aa3875b7>] do_check+0x21d8/0x45e0
[<000000001147357b>] do_check_common+0x767/0xaf0
[<00000000b5a595b4>] bpf_check+0x43e3/0x5bc0
[<0000000011e391b1>] bpf_prog_load+0xf26/0x1940
[<0000000007f765c0>] __sys_bpf+0xd2c/0x3650
[<00000000839815d6>] __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xc0
[<00000000946ee250>] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
[<0000000000506b7f>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
The root case here is: In function prepare_func_exit(), the callee is
not released in the abnormal scenario after "state->curframe--;". To
fix, move "state->curframe--;" to the very bottom of the function,
right when we free callee and reset frame[] pointer to NULL, as Andrii
suggested.
In addition, function __check_func_call() has a similar problem. In
the abnormal scenario before "state->curframe++;", the callee also
should be released by free_func_state().
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.1 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.1 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.1 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.1 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.1 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"kernel/bpf/verifier.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "d4944497827a3d14bc5a26dbcfb7433eb5a956c0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "fd978bf7fd312581a7ca454a991f0ffb34c4204b",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "83946d772e756734a900ef99dbe0aeda506adf37",
"status": "affected",
"version": "fd978bf7fd312581a7ca454a991f0ffb34c4204b",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "eb86559a691cea5fa63e57a03ec3dc9c31e97955",
"status": "affected",
"version": "fd978bf7fd312581a7ca454a991f0ffb34c4204b",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"kernel/bpf/verifier.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.20"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.20",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.80",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.0.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.0.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "19E8FB68-6A3C-43C9-82F9-900E6D4954AC",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.80",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.20",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "64F9ADD1-3ADB-4D66-A00F-4A83010B05F0",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.0.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.1:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E7E331DA-1FB0-4DEC-91AC-7DA69D461C11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.1:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "17F0B248-42CF-4AE6-A469-BB1BAE7F4705",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.1:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E2422816-0C14-4B5E-A1E6-A9D776E5C49B",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.1:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1C6E00FE-5FB9-4D20-A1A1-5A32128F9B76",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.1:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "35B26BE4-43A6-4A36-A7F6-5B3F572D9186",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Fix memory leaks in __check_func_call\n\nkmemleak reports this issue:\n\nunreferenced object 0xffff88817139d000 (size 2048):\n comm \"test_progs\", pid 33246, jiffies 4307381979 (age 45851.820s)\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................\n 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................\n backtrace:\n [\u003c0000000045f075f0\u003e] kmalloc_trace+0x27/0xa0\n [\u003c0000000098b7c90a\u003e] __check_func_call+0x316/0x1230\n [\u003c00000000b4c3c403\u003e] check_helper_call+0x172e/0x4700\n [\u003c00000000aa3875b7\u003e] do_check+0x21d8/0x45e0\n [\u003c000000001147357b\u003e] do_check_common+0x767/0xaf0\n [\u003c00000000b5a595b4\u003e] bpf_check+0x43e3/0x5bc0\n [\u003c0000000011e391b1\u003e] bpf_prog_load+0xf26/0x1940\n [\u003c0000000007f765c0\u003e] __sys_bpf+0xd2c/0x3650\n [\u003c00000000839815d6\u003e] __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xc0\n [\u003c00000000946ee250\u003e] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90\n [\u003c0000000000506b7f\u003e] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\n\nThe root case here is: In function prepare_func_exit(), the callee is\nnot released in the abnormal scenario after \"state-\u003ecurframe--;\". To\nfix, move \"state-\u003ecurframe--;\" to the very bottom of the function,\nright when we free callee and reset frame[] pointer to NULL, as Andrii\nsuggested.\n\nIn addition, function __check_func_call() has a similar problem. In\nthe abnormal scenario before \"state-\u003ecurframe++;\", the callee also\nshould be released by free_func_state()."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: bpf: Se corrigen fugas de memoria en __check_func_call kmemleak informa de este problema: objeto sin referencia 0xffff88817139d000 (tama\u00f1o 2048): comm \"test_progs\", pid 33246, jiffies 4307381979 (edad 45851.820s) volcado hexadecimal (primeros 32 bytes): 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [\u0026lt;0000000045f075f0\u0026gt;] kmalloc_trace+0x27/0xa0 [\u0026lt;0000000098b7c90a\u0026gt;] __check_func_call+0x316/0x1230 [\u0026lt;00000000b4c3c403\u0026gt;] check_helper_call+0x172e/0x4700 [\u0026lt;00000000aa3875b7\u0026gt;] do_check+0x21d8/0x45e0 [\u0026lt;000000001147357b\u0026gt;] do_check_common+0x767/0xaf0 [\u0026lt;00000000b5a595b4\u0026gt;] bpf_check+0x43e3/0x5bc0 [\u0026lt;0000000011e391b1\u0026gt;] bpf_prog_load+0xf26/0x1940 [\u0026lt;0000000007f765c0\u0026gt;] __sys_bpf+0xd2c/0x3650 [\u0026lt;00000000839815d6\u0026gt;] __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xc0 [\u0026lt;00000000946ee250\u0026gt;] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [\u0026lt;0000000000506b7f\u0026gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd El caso ra\u00edz aqu\u00ed es: En la funci\u00f3n prepare_func_exit(), el llamado no se libera en el escenario anormal despu\u00e9s de \"state-\u0026gt;curframe--;\". Para solucionarlo, mueva \"state-\u0026gt;curframe--;\" al final de la funci\u00f3n, justo cuando liberamos al destinatario y restablecemos el puntero frame[] a NULL, como sugiri\u00f3 Andrii. Adem\u00e1s, la funci\u00f3n __check_func_call() presenta un problema similar. En el escenario anormal anterior a \"state-\u0026gt;curframe++;\", el destinatario tambi\u00e9n deber\u00eda ser liberado por free_func_state()."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2022-49837",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T05:19:15.730",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2022-49837",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-01T17:02:23.476033Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-05-01T15:16:07.187",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83946d772e756734a900ef99dbe0aeda506adf37"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d4944497827a3d14bc5a26dbcfb7433eb5a956c0"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb86559a691cea5fa63e57a03ec3dc9c31e97955"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-401"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-401"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.