FKIE_CVE-2022-49079
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-02-26 07:00 - Updated: 2026-06-17 05:17
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: zoned: traverse devices under chunk_mutex in btrfs_can_activate_zone
btrfs_can_activate_zone() can be called with the device_list_mutex already
held, which will lead to a deadlock:
insert_dev_extents() // Takes device_list_mutex
`-> insert_dev_extent()
`-> btrfs_insert_empty_item()
`-> btrfs_insert_empty_items()
`-> btrfs_search_slot()
`-> btrfs_cow_block()
`-> __btrfs_cow_block()
`-> btrfs_alloc_tree_block()
`-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
`-> find_free_extent()
`-> find_free_extent_update_loop()
`-> can_allocate_chunk()
`-> btrfs_can_activate_zone() // Takes device_list_mutex again
Instead of using the RCU on fs_devices->device_list we
can use fs_devices->alloc_list, protected by the chunk_mutex to traverse
the list of active devices.
We are in the chunk allocation thread. The newer chunk allocation
happens from the devices in the fs_device->alloc_list protected by the
chunk_mutex.
btrfs_create_chunk()
lockdep_assert_held(&info->chunk_mutex);
gather_device_info
list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->alloc_list, dev_alloc_list)
Also, a device that reappears after the mount won't join the alloc_list
yet and, it will be in the dev_list, which we don't want to consider in
the context of the chunk alloc.
[15.166572] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[15.167117] 5.17.0-rc6-dennis #79 Not tainted
[15.167487] --------------------------------------------
[15.167733] kworker/u8:3/146 is trying to acquire lock:
[15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.167733]
[15.167733] but task is already holding lock:
[15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs]
[15.167733]
[15.167733] other info that might help us debug this:
[15.167733] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[15.167733]
[15.171834] CPU0
[15.171834] ----
[15.171834] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
[15.171834] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
[15.171834]
[15.171834] *** DEADLOCK ***
[15.171834]
[15.171834] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[15.171834]
[15.171834] 5 locks held by kworker/u8:3/146:
[15.171834] #0: ffff888100050938 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0
[15.171834] #1: ffffc9000067be80 ((work_completion)(&fs_info->async_data_reclaim_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0
[15.176244] #2: ffff88810521e620 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: flush_space+0x335/0x600 [btrfs]
[15.176244] #3: ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs]
[15.176244] #4: ffff8881152e4b78 (btrfs-dev-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x130 [btrfs]
[15.179641]
[15.179641] stack backtrace:
[15.179641] CPU: 1 PID: 146 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc6-dennis #79
[15.179641] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1.fc35 04/01/2014
[15.179641] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
[15.179641] Call Trace:
[15.179641] <TASK>
[15.179641] dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x59
[15.179641] __lock_acquire.cold+0x217/0x2b2
[15.179641] lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0
[15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.183838] __mutex_lock+0x8e/0x970
[15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.183838] ? lock_is_held_type+0xd7/0x130
[15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.183838] find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.183838] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x24/0x40
[15.183838] ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x106/0x230 [btrfs]
[15.187601] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x131/0x260 [btrfs]
[15.
---truncated---
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 5.18 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/btrfs/zoned.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "09e65ae515af2b24d6dc23af21719a3b41de83e5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "a85f05e59bc15a83ad910dbcb71df5ad8fa77295",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "142f822bd945a7be442a2916ec6167cc102c4183",
"status": "affected",
"version": "a85f05e59bc15a83ad910dbcb71df5ad8fa77295",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0b9e66762aa0cda2a9c2d5542d64e04dac528fa6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "a85f05e59bc15a83ad910dbcb71df5ad8fa77295",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/btrfs/zoned.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.16"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.16",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.16.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.16.20",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.17.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.17.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.18",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "ABBBA66E-0244-4621-966B-9790AF1EEB00",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.16.20",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "AE420AC7-1E59-4398-B84F-71F4B4337762",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.17.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.17",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.18:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6AD94161-84BB-42E6-9882-4FC0C42E9FC1",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: zoned: traverse devices under chunk_mutex in btrfs_can_activate_zone\n\nbtrfs_can_activate_zone() can be called with the device_list_mutex already\nheld, which will lead to a deadlock:\n\ninsert_dev_extents() // Takes device_list_mutex\n`-\u003e insert_dev_extent()\n `-\u003e btrfs_insert_empty_item()\n `-\u003e btrfs_insert_empty_items()\n `-\u003e btrfs_search_slot()\n `-\u003e btrfs_cow_block()\n `-\u003e __btrfs_cow_block()\n `-\u003e btrfs_alloc_tree_block()\n `-\u003e btrfs_reserve_extent()\n `-\u003e find_free_extent()\n `-\u003e find_free_extent_update_loop()\n `-\u003e can_allocate_chunk()\n `-\u003e btrfs_can_activate_zone() // Takes device_list_mutex again\n\nInstead of using the RCU on fs_devices-\u003edevice_list we\ncan use fs_devices-\u003ealloc_list, protected by the chunk_mutex to traverse\nthe list of active devices.\n\nWe are in the chunk allocation thread. The newer chunk allocation\nhappens from the devices in the fs_device-\u003ealloc_list protected by the\nchunk_mutex.\n\n btrfs_create_chunk()\n lockdep_assert_held(\u0026info-\u003echunk_mutex);\n gather_device_info\n list_for_each_entry(device, \u0026fs_devices-\u003ealloc_list, dev_alloc_list)\n\nAlso, a device that reappears after the mount won\u0027t join the alloc_list\nyet and, it will be in the dev_list, which we don\u0027t want to consider in\nthe context of the chunk alloc.\n\n [15.166572] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected\n [15.167117] 5.17.0-rc6-dennis #79 Not tainted\n [15.167487] --------------------------------------------\n [15.167733] kworker/u8:3/146 is trying to acquire lock:\n [15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (\u0026fs_devs-\u003edevice_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]\n [15.167733]\n [15.167733] but task is already holding lock:\n [15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (\u0026fs_devs-\u003edevice_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs]\n [15.167733]\n [15.167733] other info that might help us debug this:\n [15.167733] Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n [15.167733]\n [15.171834] CPU0\n [15.171834] ----\n [15.171834] lock(\u0026fs_devs-\u003edevice_list_mutex);\n [15.171834] lock(\u0026fs_devs-\u003edevice_list_mutex);\n [15.171834]\n [15.171834] *** DEADLOCK ***\n [15.171834]\n [15.171834] May be due to missing lock nesting notation\n [15.171834]\n [15.171834] 5 locks held by kworker/u8:3/146:\n [15.171834] #0: ffff888100050938 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0\n [15.171834] #1: ffffc9000067be80 ((work_completion)(\u0026fs_info-\u003easync_data_reclaim_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0\n [15.176244] #2: ffff88810521e620 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: flush_space+0x335/0x600 [btrfs]\n [15.176244] #3: ffff888102962ee0 (\u0026fs_devs-\u003edevice_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs]\n [15.176244] #4: ffff8881152e4b78 (btrfs-dev-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x130 [btrfs]\n [15.179641]\n [15.179641] stack backtrace:\n [15.179641] CPU: 1 PID: 146 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc6-dennis #79\n [15.179641] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1.fc35 04/01/2014\n [15.179641] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]\n [15.179641] Call Trace:\n [15.179641] \u003cTASK\u003e\n [15.179641] dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x59\n [15.179641] __lock_acquire.cold+0x217/0x2b2\n [15.179641] lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0\n [15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]\n [15.183838] __mutex_lock+0x8e/0x970\n [15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]\n [15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]\n [15.183838] ? lock_is_held_type+0xd7/0x130\n [15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]\n [15.183838] find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]\n [15.183838] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x24/0x40\n [15.183838] ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x106/0x230 [btrfs]\n [15.187601] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x131/0x260 [btrfs]\n [15.\n---truncated---"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: btrfs: zoned: atravesar dispositivos bajo chunk_mutex en btrfs_can_activate_zone btrfs_can_activate_zone() se puede llamar con el device_list_mutex ya retenido, lo que provocar\u00e1 un bloqueo: insert_dev_extents() // Toma device_list_mutex `-\u0026gt; insert_dev_extent() `-\u0026gt; btrfs_insert_empty_item() `-\u0026gt; btrfs_insert_empty_items() `-\u0026gt; btrfs_search_slot() `-\u0026gt; btrfs_cow_block() `-\u0026gt; __btrfs_cow_block() `-\u0026gt; btrfs_alloc_tree_block() `-\u0026gt; btrfs_reserve_extent() `-\u0026gt; find_free_extent() `-\u0026gt; find_free_extent_update_loop() `-\u0026gt; can_allocate_chunk() `-\u0026gt; btrfs_can_activate_zone() // Toma device_list_mutex nuevamente En lugar de usar la RCU en fs_devices-\u0026gt;device_list podemos usar fs_devices-\u0026gt;alloc_list, protegido por chunk_mutex para recorrer la lista de dispositivos activos. Estamos en el hilo de asignaci\u00f3n de fragmentos. La asignaci\u00f3n de fragmentos m\u00e1s nueva ocurre desde los dispositivos en fs_device-\u0026gt;alloc_list protegidos por chunk_mutex. btrfs_create_chunk() lockdep_assert_held(\u0026amp;info-\u0026gt;chunk_mutex); gather_device_info list_for_each_entry(device, \u0026amp;fs_devices-\u0026gt;alloc_list, dev_alloc_list) Adem\u00e1s, un dispositivo que reaparece despu\u00e9s del montaje no se unir\u00e1 a alloc_list todav\u00eda y estar\u00e1 en dev_list, que no queremos considerar en el contexto de la asignaci\u00f3n de fragmentos. [15.166572] ADVERTENCIA: se detect\u00f3 un posible bloqueo recursivo [15.167117] 5.17.0-rc6-dennis #79 No contaminado [15.167487] -------------------------------------------- [15.167733] kworker/u8:3/146 est\u00e1 intentando adquirir el bloqueo: [15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (\u0026amp;fs_devs-\u0026gt;device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, en: find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.167733] [15.167733] pero la tarea ya tiene el bloqueo: [15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (\u0026amp;fs_devs-\u0026gt;device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, en: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs] [15.167733] [15.167733] otra informaci\u00f3n que podr\u00eda ayudarnos a depurar esto: [15.167733] Posible escenario de bloqueo inseguro: [15.167733] [15.171834] CPU0 [15.171834] ---- [15.171834] lock(\u0026amp;fs_devs-\u0026gt;device_list_mutex); [15.171834] lock(\u0026amp;fs_devs-\u0026gt;device_list_mutex); [15.171834] [15.171834] *** BLOQUEO INTERMEDIO *** [15.171834] [15.171834] Puede deberse a la falta de notaci\u00f3n de anidamiento de bloqueos [15.171834] [15.171834] 5 bloqueos retenidos por kworker/u8:3/146: [15.171834] #0: ffff888100050938 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, en: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0 [15.171834] #1: ffffc9000067be80 ((work_completion)(\u0026amp;fs_info-\u0026gt;async_data_reclaim_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0 [15.176244] #2: ffff88810521e620 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: flush_space+0x335/0x600 [btrfs] [15.176244] #3: ffff888102962ee0 (\u0026amp;fs_devs-\u0026gt;device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs] [15.176244] #4: ffff8881152e4b78 (btrfs-dev-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x130 [btrfs] [15.179641] [15.179641] stack backtrace: [15.179641] CPU: 1 PID: 146 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc6-dennis #79 [15.179641] Nombre del hardware: PC est\u00e1ndar QEMU (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1.fc35 01/04/2014 [15.179641] Cola de trabajo: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs] [15.179641] Rastreo de llamadas: [15.179641] [15.179641] dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x59 [15.179641] __lock_acquire.cold+0x217/0x2b2 [15.179641] lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0 [15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.183838] __mutex_lock+0x8e/0x970 [15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.183838] ? lock_is_held_type+0xd7/0x130 [15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.183838] find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs] [15.183838] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x24/0x40 [15.183838] ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x106/0x230 [btrfs] [15.187601] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x131/0x260 [btrfs] [15. ---truncado---"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2022-49079",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T05:17:01.360",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-02-26T07:00:45.250",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/09e65ae515af2b24d6dc23af21719a3b41de83e5"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0b9e66762aa0cda2a9c2d5542d64e04dac528fa6"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/142f822bd945a7be442a2916ec6167cc102c4183"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-667"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.